The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Successful Aging: Predictors and Associated Activities
Abstract
Six-year predictors of successful aging were analyzed for 356 Alameda County Study men and women aged 65-95 years measured prospectively in 1984 and followed to 1990. Successful aging was defined as needing no assistance nor having difficulty on any of 13 activity/mobility measures plus little or no difficulty on five physical performance measures. After adjusting for baseline successful aging, sex, and age, the authors found that 1984 predictors of 1990 successful aging included income above the lowest quintile (odds ratio (OR) = 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-4.11), > or = 12 years of education (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 0.98-2.84), white ethnicity (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 0.93-4.86), diabetes (OR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.79), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.97), arthritis (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.71), and hearing problems (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.89). Adjusting for all variables, the authors found that behavioral and psychosocial predictors included the absence of depression (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.10-3.42), having close personal contacts (OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.05-3.18), and often walks for exercise (OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.00-3.12). Cross-sectional comparisons at follow-up revealed significantly higher community involvement, physical activity, and mental health for those aging successfully.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
BERKMAN, L. F., & SYME, S. L. (1979) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674 · Cited by 5,341
Physical Activity, All-Cause Mortality, and Longevity of College Alumni
Paffenbarger, R. S., Hyde, R., Wing, A. L., & Hsieh, C.-C. (1986) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198603063141003 · Cited by 2,742
Cited by
Depp, C. A., & Jeste, D. V. (2006) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.jgp.0000192501.03069.bc · Cited by 1,292
Paterson, D. H., & Warburton, D. E. (2010) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-38 · Cited by 953
Older Adults' Views of “Successful Aging”—How Do They Compare with Researchers' Definitions?
Phelan, E. A., Anderson, L. A., Lacroix, A. Z., & Larson, E. B. (2004) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52056.x · Cited by 582
The 2030 Problem: Caring for Aging Baby Boomers
Knickman, J. R., & Snell, E. K. (2002) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0560.2002.56.x · Cited by 510
Diabetes and incidence of functional disability in older women
Gregg, E. W., Mangione, C. M., Cauley, J. A., Thompson, T. J., Schwartz, A. V., Ensrud, K. E., Nevitt, M. C., & for the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.1.61 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Strawbridge, W. J., Cohen, R. D., Shema, S. J., & Kaplan, G. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-07-15
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-141
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2145073777
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.