Cited by 333Aging, Health, and DisabilityFrailty in Older AdultsChronic Disease Management Strategies

Diabetes and incidence of functional disability in older women

Open access
Gregg, Edward W., Mangione, Carol M., Cauley, Jane A., Thompson, Theodore J., Schwartz, Ann V., Ensrud, Kristine E., Nevitt, Michael C., for the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group·2002·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between diabetes and the incidence of functional disability and to determine the predictors of functional disability among older women with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 8,344 women enrolled in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures, a prospective cohort of women aged > or =65 years. Diabetes (n = 527, 6.3% prevalence) and comorbidities (coronary heart disease, stroke, arthritis, depression, and visual impairment) were assessed by questionnaire and physical examination. Incident disability, defined as onset of inability to do one or more major functional tasks (walking 0.25 mile, climbing 10 steps, performing household chores, shopping, and cooking meals), was assessed by questionnaire over 12 years. RESULTS: The yearly incidence of any functional disability was 9.8% among women with diabetes and 4.8% among women without diabetes. The age-adjusted hazard rate ratio (HRR) of disability for specific tasks associated with diabetes ranged from 2.12 (1.82-2.48) for doing housework to 2.50 (2.05-3.04) for walking two to three blocks. After adjustment for potential confounders at baseline (BMI, physical activity, estrogen use, baseline functional status, visual impairment, and marital status) and comorbidities (heart disease, stroke, depression, and arthritis), diabetes remained associated with a 42% increased risk of any incident disability and a 53-98% increased risk of disability for specific tasks. Among women with diabetes, older age, higher BMI, coronary heart disease, arthritis, physical inactivity, and severe visual impairment at baseline were each independently associated with disability. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is associated with an increased incidence of functional disability, which is likely to further erode health status and quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.25.1.61

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional limitations related to poor sleep have been reported as difficulty performing six IADLs, including walking 2-3 blocks, walking up or down 10 steps, preparing meals, heavy housework, and shopping.

    “Functional limitations related to poor sleep have been reported as difficulty performing 6 instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) which included walking 2–3 blocks, walking up or down 10 steps, preparing meals, heavy housework, and shopping.(Gregg, Mangione, Cauley, Thompson, Schwartz, Ensrud, and Nevitt 2002)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gregg, E. W., Mangione, C. M., Cauley, J. A., Thompson, T. J., Schwartz, A. V., Ensrud, K. E., Nevitt, M. C., & for the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2002-01-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
61-67
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2094323726
Cited by
333
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 22
FWCI
14.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG05394, AG-05407)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR035584, AR35583, AR-35584, AR 35582, R01AR035582, R01AR035583)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, functional disability, older women, disability incidence, comorbidities, coronary artery disease, arthritis, visual impairment, physical inactivity, body mass index, housework, walking ability, predictors of disability
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Coronary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Osteoarthritis, Predictive Value of Tests, Smoking, United States, Cohort Studies, Exercise, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Age of Onset, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review