The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tea Consumption and Cancer Incidence in a Prospective Cohort Study of Postmenopausal Women
Open accessAbstract
Tea has consistently been shown to inhibit the occurrence of tumors in experimental animals. The evidence for such a beneficial effect in humans, however, is limited. The authors examined the association between non-herbal tea consumption and cancer incidence in a prospective cohort study of 35,369 postmenopausal Iowa women. In this cohort, information on the frequency of tea drinking and other dietary and lifestyle factors was collected by mailed survey in 1986. After 8 years of follow-up, 2,936 incident non-skin cancer cases were ascertained in this cohort through the State Health Registry of Iowa. Proportional hazards regressions were used to derive adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for the association between tea consumption and cancer incidence. After controlling for confounding factors, the authors found that regular tea consumption was related to a slight, but not statistically significant, reduced incidence of all cancers combined. Inverse associations with increasing frequency of tea drinking were seen for cancers of the digestive tract (p for trend, 0.04) and the urinary tract (p for trend, 0.02). For women who reported drinking > or = 2 cups (474 ml) of tea per day, compared with those who never or occasionally drank tea, the relative risk for digestive tract cancers was 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.98) and for urinary tract cancers, 0.40 (95% CI 0.16-0.98). Similar inverse associations were seen for specific digestive and urinary tract cancers, although site-specific analyses were not statistically significant. No appreciable association of tea drinking was found with melanoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, or cancers of the pancreas, lung, breast, uterine corpus, or ovary. This study suggests that tea, one of the most popular beverages consumed worldwide, may protect against some cancers in postmenopausal women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses.
WILLETT, W., & STAMPFER, M. J. (1986) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114366 · Cited by 2,751
Cited by
Bosch, R., Philips, N., Suárez-Pérez, J., Juarranz, A., Devmurari, A., Chalensouk-Khaosaat, J., & González, S. (2015) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox4020248 · Cited by 407
High-Temperature Beverages and Foods and Esophageal Cancer Risk—A Systematic Review
Islami, F., Boffetta, P., Ren, J., Pedoeim, L., Khatib, D., & Kamangar, F. (2009) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.24445 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, W., Doyle, T. J., Kushi, L. H., Sellers, T. A., Hong, C.-P., & Folsom, A. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-07-15
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-182
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2134587604
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tea Consumption and Cancer Incidence in a Prospective Cohort Study of Postmenopausal Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008905
- The paper
- Zheng, W., Doyle, T. J., Kushi, L. H., Sellers, T. A., Hong, C.-P., & Folsom, A. R. (1996). Tea Consumption and Cancer Incidence in a Prospective Cohort Study of Postmenopausal Women. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008905
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.