Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,834

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age-specific Incidence Rates of Myocardial Infarction and Angina in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparison with the Framingham Study

Manzi, S., Meilahn, E. N, Rairie, J. E, Conte, C. G., Medsger, T. A., Jansen-McWilliams, L., D'Agostino, R. B., Kuller, L. H.·1997·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The authors ascertained cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction and angina pectoris) in 498 women with systemic lupus erythematosus seen at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 1980 to 1993 (3,522 person-years). Subjects were stratified by age, and cardiovascular event incidence rates were determined. The authors compared these rates with cardiovascular event rates were determined. The authors compared these rates with cardiovascular event rates occurring over the same time period in 2,208 women of similar age participating in the Framingham Offspring Study (17,519 person-years). Age-specific rate ratios were computed to determine whether the cardiovascular events in the lupus cohort were greater than expected. The risk factors associated with cardiovascular events in women with lupus were determined. There were 33 first events (11 myocardial infarction, 10 angina pectoris, and 12 both angina pectoris and myocardial infarction) after the diagnosis of lupus: two thirds were under the age of 55 years at the time of event. Women with lupus in the 35- to 44-year age group were over 50 times more likely to have a myocardial infarction than were women of similar age in the Framingham Offspring Study (rate ratio = 52.43, 95% confidence interval 21.6-98.5). Older age at lupus diagnosis, longer lupus disease duration, longer duration of corticosteroid use, hypercholesterolemia, and postmenopausal status were more common in the women with lupus who had a cardiovascular event than in those who did not have an event. Premature cardiovascular disease is much more common in young premenopausal women with lupus than in a population sample. With the increased life expectancy of lupus patients due to improved therapy, cardiovascular disease has emerged as a significant threat to the health of these women. The impact of this problem has been underrecognized, with little focus placed on aggressive management of hypercholesterolemia and other possible risk factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009122

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,834

Metadata

Authors
Manzi, S., Meilahn, E. N., Rairie, J. E., Conte, C. G., Medsger, T. A., Jansen-McWilliams, L., D'Agostino, R. B., & Kuller, L. H.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1997-03-01
Volume
145
Issue
5
Pages
408-415
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2165779517
Cited by
1,834
References
2
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age-specific Incidence Rates of Myocardial Infarction and Angina in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparison with the Framingham Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009122
The paper
Manzi, S., Meilahn, E. N., Rairie, J. E., Conte, C. G., Medsger, T. A., Jansen-McWilliams, L., D'Agostino, R. B., & Kuller, L. H. (1997). Age-specific Incidence Rates of Myocardial Infarction and Angina in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparison with the Framingham Study. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009122

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.