Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Associations of Race/Ethnicity, Education, and Dietary Intervention with the Validity and Reliability of a Food Frequency Questionnaire: The Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations

Kristal, A. R., Feng, Z., Coates, R. J., Oberman, A., George, V.·1997·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

This report describes the associations of race/ethnicity and years of education with the validity, reliability, and bias of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) designed to be sensitive to low-fat, regional, and ethnic dietary patterns. Data were from the Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations, a randomized clinical trial conducted between 1992 and 1994 to test the feasibility of a low-fat dietary intervention that targeted low-income, black, and Hispanic women. Of 1,015 participants eligible for these analyses, 28.1% were black, 16.2% were Hispanic, and 12.3% had not completed high school. The analyses focused on percentage of energy obtained from fat, and used 4-day food records as the criterion instrument. Validity at baseline, defined as the correlation between FFQs and food records, was lower among blacks than among whites (0.26 vs. 0.49; p < 0.001), did not differ between Hispanics and whites, and was lower among women with fewer years of education (0.19, 0.35, 0.49, and 0.42 for <12, 12, 13-15, and > or =16 years of education, respectively; for trend, p < 0.05). Six months after randomization, validity increased in most race/ethnicity and education subgroups, and differences across groups became small and statistically nonsignificant. Validity increased significantly among participants receiving the dietary intervention, while increases among control women were somewhat smaller. Reliability, defined as the correlation between baseline and 6-month measures among controls, was similar across racial/ethnic and educational groups. Bias at baseline, defined as the mean value from the FFQ minus the mean from the food record, was 4.6 percentage points of energy from fat; it was lowest among blacks (p < 0.01) and did not differ by years of education. These results suggest that special protocols which address participant training may be necessary when using self-administered FFQs in minority or poorly educated populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009203

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Kristal, A. R., Feng, Z., Coates, R. J., Oberman, A., & George, V.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1997-11-15
Volume
146
Issue
10
Pages
856-869
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2129388504
Cited by
298
References
0
FWCI
13.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Associations of Race/Ethnicity, Education, and Dietary Intervention with the Validity and Reliability of a Food Frequency Questionnaire: The Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009203
The paper
Kristal, A. R., Feng, Z., Coates, R. J., Oberman, A., & George, V. (1997). Associations of Race/Ethnicity, Education, and Dietary Intervention with the Validity and Reliability of a Food Frequency Questionnaire: The Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.