Cited by 103

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Smoking in the United States and Sweden

MacDorman, M. F., Cnattingius, S., Hoffman, H. J., Kramer, M. S., Haglund, B.·1997·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The association between sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and maternal smoking was compared between the United States and Sweden-two countries with different health care and social support programs and degrees of sociocultural heterogeneity. For 1990-1991 among the five US race/ethnic groups studied, SIDS rates ranged from a high of 3.0 infant deaths per 1,000 live births for American Indians to a low of 0.8 for Hispanics and Asian and Pacific Islanders. The SIDS rate for Sweden (using 1983-1992 data) was 0.9. The strong association between maternal smoking and SIDS persisted after controlling for maternal age and live birth order. Adjusted odds ratios ranged from 1.6 to 2.5 for mothers who smoked 1-9 cigarettes per day during pregnancy (compared with nonsmokers) and from 2.3 to 3.8 for mothers who smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day during pregnancy. Although birth weight had a strong independent effect on SIDS, the addition of birth weight to the models lowered the odds ratios for maternal smoking only slightly, suggesting that the effect of smoking on SIDS is not mediated through birth weight. SIDS rates increased with the amount smoked for all US race/ethnic groups and for Sweden. Smoking is one of the most important preventable risk factors for SIDS, and smoking prevention/intervention programs have the potential to substantially lower SIDS rates in the United States and Sweden and presumably elsewhere as well.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009260

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • A quality study of a medical birth registry

    Cnattingius, S., Ericson, A., Gunnarskog, J., & Källén, B. (1990) · Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine · doi:10.1177/140349489001800209 · Cited by 972 · cited 1×

    “The Birth Register receives prospectively collected comprehensive information on more than 99 percent of all births in Sweden ( 19 ).”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
MacDorman, M. F., Cnattingius, S., Hoffman, H. J., Kramer, M. S., & Haglund, B.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
146
Issue
3
Pages
249-257
ISSN
  • 0002-9262
  • 1476-6256
Cited by
103
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review