Cited by 973Medical Coding and Health InformationSurvey Methodology and NonresponseData Quality and Management

A quality study of a medical birth registry

Cnattingius, Sven, Ericson, Anders, Gunnarskog, Jan, Källén, Bengt·1990·Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine

Abstract

A quality control study was made of the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. This registry used one mode of data collection during 1973-1981 and another from 1982 onwards. The number of errors in the register was checked by comparing register information with a sample of the original medical records, and the variability in the use of diagnoses between hospitals was studied. Different types of errors were identified and quantified and the efficiency of the two methods of data collection evaluated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/140349489001800209

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cnattingius, S., Ericson, A., Gunnarskog, J., & Källén, B.
Affiliations
  • National Board of Health and Welfare (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine
Published
1990-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
143-148
ISSN
0300-8037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035263233
Cited by
972
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 44
FWCI
31.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
Keywords
medical birth registry, data quality, data errors, medical records, hospital diagnoses, interhospital variation, data collection methods, quality control
MeSH terms
Birth Certificates, Diagnosis, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Medical Records, Quality Control, Registries, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review