Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A SURVEY OF A POPULATION EXPOSED TO HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF ARSENIC IN WELL WATER IN FAIRBANKS, ALASKA

HARRINGTON, J. MALCOLM, MIDDAUGH, JOHN P., MORSE, DALE L., HOUSWORTH, JERE·1978·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Following the discovery of high concentrations of arsenic (up to 10,000 μg/liter) In the well water of a residential area near Fairbanks, Alaska, an epidemiologic study was undertaken in September, 1976, to assess exposure, absorption, and clinical sequelae of chronic arsenic ingestion. Two hundred eleven (91%) of 232 area residents completed questionnaires relating to water consumption history and to the signs and symptoms of arsenicalism. Physical examinations were conducted, and complete blood counts performed. Urine, hair, nail, and well water samples were analyzed for arsenic content. Urine arsenic levels above 2 μg/100 ml were found in 130/198 (66%) of the study population. Hair arsenic levels above 1 μg/g occurred in 74/181 (41%), and nail arsenic levels above 4 μg/g In 49/132 (37%). In well-water drinkers, a close correlation was found between well water arsenic levels and levels of arsenic In urine (r = 0.58, p < 10−8). Mean urine arsenic levels (17.83 μg/100 ml) In persons who drank well water containing ≥100μg arsenic/liter were significantly greater than levels in bottled-water drinkers or In well-water drinkers exposed to <100μg arsenic/liter (mean 4.09 μg/100 ml; p < 10−10). Hair arsenic levels also correlated positively with well water arsenic levels (r = 0.43; p < 10−6), but may have reflected external contamination of hair during washing. Nail arsenic levels correlated poorly with well water arsenic exposure. Despite the chronic Increased exposure of the study population to arsenic, no clinical or hematologic abnormalities were found. Although the study did not consider long-term carcinogenic effects, based on the water level of arsenic (100 μg/liter) above which urine arsenic In drinkers Increases, the EPA standard (50 μg/liter) seems reasonable and conservative.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112635

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
HARRINGTON, J. M., MIDDAUGH, J. P., MORSE, D. L., & HOUSWORTH, J.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1978-11
Volume
108
Issue
5
Pages
377-385
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W1912533217
Cited by
172
References
0
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A SURVEY OF A POPULATION EXPOSED TO HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF ARSENIC IN WELL WATER IN FAIRBANKS, ALASKA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112635
The paper
HARRINGTON, J. M., MIDDAUGH, J. P., MORSE, D. L., & HOUSWORTH, J. (1978). A SURVEY OF A POPULATION EXPOSED TO HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF ARSENIC IN WELL WATER IN FAIRBANKS, ALASKA. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112635

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.