The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The UK Biobank sample handling and storage protocol for the collection, processing and archiving of human blood and urine
Abstract
BACKGROUND: UK Biobank is a large prospective study in the UK to investigate the role of genetic factors, environmental exposures and lifestyle in the causes of major diseases of late and middle age. Extensive data and biological samples are being collected from 500,000 participants aged between 40 and 69 years. The biological samples that are collected and how they are processed and stored will have a major impact on the future scientific usefulness of the UK Biobank resource. AIMS: The aim of the UK Biobank sample handling and storage protocol is to specify methods for the collection and storage of participant samples that give maximum scientific return within the available budget. Processing or storage methods that, as far as can be predicted, will preclude current or future assays have been avoided. METHODS: The protocol was developed through a review of the literature on sample handling and processing, wide consultation within the academic community and peer review. Protocol development addressed which samples should be collected, how and when they should be processed and how the processed samples should be stored to ensure their long-term integrity. The recommended protocol was extensively tested in a series of validation studies. UK Biobank collects about 45 ml blood and 9 ml of urine with minimal local processing from each participant using the vacutainer system. A variety of preservatives, anti-coagulants and clot accelerators is used appropriate to the expected end use of the samples. Collection of other material (hair, nails, saliva and faeces) was also considered but rejected for the full cohort. Blood and urine samples from participants are transported overnight by commercial courier to a central laboratory where they are processed and aliquots of urine, plasma, serum, white cells and red cells stored in ultra-low temperature archives. Aliquots of whole blood are also stored for potential future production of immortalized cell lines. A standard panel of haematology assays is completed on whole blood from all participants, since such assays need to be conducted on fresh samples (whereas other assays can be done on stored samples). By the end of the recruitment phase, 15 million sample aliquots will be stored in two geographically separate archives: 9.5 million in a -80 degrees C automated archive and 5.5 million in a manual liquid nitrogen archive at -180 degrees C. Because of the size of the study and the numbers of samples obtained from participants, the protocol stipulates a highly automated approach for the processing and storage of samples. Implementation of the processes, technology, systems and facilities has followed best practices used in manufacturing industry to reduce project risk and to build in quality and robustness. The data produced from sample collection, processing and storage are highly complex and are managed by a commercially available LIMS system fully integrated with the entire process. CONCLUSION: The sample handling and storage protocol adopted by UK Biobank provides quality assured and validated methods that are feasible within the available funding and reflect the size and aims of the project. Experience from recruiting and processing the first 40,000 participants to the study demonstrates that the adopted methods and technologies are fit-for-purpose and robust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gut microorganisms, mammalian metabolism and personalized health care
Nicholson, J. K., Holmes, E., & Wilson, I. D. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1152 · Cited by 945
Riboli, E. (1997) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/26.suppl_1.s6 · Cited by 945
The EPIC Project: Rationale and study design
Ríboli, E., & Kaaks, R. (1997) · International Journal of Epidemiology · Cited by 475
Folate, vitamin B12, homocysteine status and DNA damage in young Australian adults
Fenech, M. (1998) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/19.7.1163 · Cited by 308
Costantino, C., Cinquetti, S., Garavelli, E., Marcantoni, C., Murru, C., Pieroni, G., Privitera, G. P., Ricciardi, W., Soncini, F., Tedesco, D., et al. (2014) · CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) · Cited by 281
INTERMAP: background, aims, design, methods, and descriptive statistics (nondietary)
Stamler, J., Elliott, P., Dennis, B., Dyer, A., Kesteloot, H., Liu, K., Ueshima, H., Zhou, B., & for the INTERMAP Research Group (2003) · Journal of Human Hypertension · doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1001603 · Cited by 280
Self-citationBiological sample collection and processing for molecular epidemiological studies
Holland, N. T., Smith, M. T., Eskenazi, B., & Bastaki, M. (2003) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/s1383-5742(02)00090-x · Cited by 279
Metabolism of arsenobetaine in mice, rats and rabbits
Vahter, M., MARAFANTE, E., & Dencker, L. (1983) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/0048-9697(83)90012-8 · Cited by 248
Measuring cytokine levels in blood
Thavasu, P. W., Longhurst, S., Joel, S. P., Slevin, M. L., & Balkwill, F. R. (1992) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/0022-1759(92)90313-i · Cited by 241
HARRINGTON, J. M., MIDDAUGH, J. P., MORSE, D. L., & HOUSWORTH, J. (1978) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112635 · Cited by 172
Cited by
Sudlow, C., Gallacher, J., Allen, N., Beral, V., Burton, P., Danesh, J., Downey, P., Elliott, P., Green, J., Landray, M., et al. (2015) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 · Cited by 12,728
Self-citationThe UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data
Bycroft, C., Freeman, C., Petkova, D., Band, G., Elliott, L. T., Sharp, K., Motyer, A., Vukcevic, D., Delaneau, O., O’Connell, J., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z · Cited by 8,876
What makes UK Biobank special?
Collins, R. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60404-8 · Cited by 1,128
Million Veteran Program: A mega-biobank to study genetic influences on health and disease
Gaziano, J. M., Concato, J., Brophy, M., Fiore, L., Pyarajan, S., Breeling, J., Whitbourne, S., Deen, J., Shannon, C., Humphries, D., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.016 · Cited by 1,055
Richardson, T. G., Sanderson, E., Palmer, T. M., Ala-Korpela, M., Ference, B. A., Davey Smith, G., & Holmes, M. V. (2020) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003062 · Cited by 843
Metadata
- Authors
- Elliott, P., Peakman, T. C., & Biobank, O. B. O. U.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-04-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 234-244
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2127167918
- Cited by
- 991
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 12.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The UK Biobank sample handling and storage protocol for the collection, processing and archiving of human blood and urine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/dym276
- The paper
- Elliott, P., Peakman, T. C., & Biobank, O. B. O. U. (2008). The UK Biobank sample handling and storage protocol for the collection, processing and archiving of human blood and urine. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dym276
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.