Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 716

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

RISK FACTORS IN DENGUE SHOCK SYNDROME: A PROSPECTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY IN RAYONG, THAILAND

SANGKAWIBHA, NADHIRAT, ROJANASUPHOT, SUNTHAREE, AHANDRIK, SOMPOP, VIRIYAPONGSE, SUKHO, JATANASEN, SUJARTI, SALITUL, VIRAJ, PHANTHUMACHINDA, BOONLUAN, HALSTEAD, SCOTT B.·1984·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

In January 1980, the municipal area of Rayong, Thailand, and contiguous suburban villages were chosen for a long-term study on dengue epidemiology. From 3,185 children randomly sampled in schools and households, the population prevalence of neutralizing antibody to the four dengue serotypes was estimated. To estimate the incidence of infection with each dengue virus serotype (dengue seroconversions), first grade children were re-bled in January 1981 (cohort study). Children admitted to hospital were studied for dengue virus isolation and antibody responses in paired sera. An epidemic of dengue occurred in 1980. Plaque reduction neutralization tests of 1,009 pre-epidemic sera from children aged less than 1-10 years of age determined that 3.3% were immune to dengue 1, 13.2% to dengue 2, 6.4% to dengue 3, and 5.8% to dengue 4. Examination of pre- and post-epidemic cohort blood samples revealed that the incidence of dengue infection in 251 seronegative children was 39.4% (15.1% dengue 1, 11.1% dengue 2, 2.0% dengue 3, 4.8% dengue 4, and 6.4% two or more dengue viruses). Among the 52,935 residents of the study area, there were 22 cases of virologically and clinically confirmed dengue shock syndrome, in children 15 years or younger. All 22 shock syndrome cases had secondary type antibody responses. Eight of 22 had been included in the random serologic sample prior to onset of shock; five had been immune to dengue 1, two to dengue 3, one to dengue 4, and none to dengue 2. Despite the high rate of dengue 1 infections in 1980, only dengue 2 viruses were recovered from dengue shock syndrome cases, including two dengue 1 immune children with pre-illness serum specimens. Although the pre-epidemic prevalence of antibodies to dengue 1 was the lowest to any type, children with this immunologic background contributed disproportionately to shock cases. In descending order of magnitude, risk factors for dengue shock syndrome in Rayong were secondary infections with dengue 2 which followed primary infections with dengue 1, dengue 3, or dengue 4.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113932

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 716

Metadata

Authors
SANGKAWIBHA, N., ROJANASUPHOT, S., AHANDRIK, S., VIRIYAPONGSE, S., JATANASEN, S., SALITUL, V., PHANTHUMACHINDA, B., & HALSTEAD, S. B.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1984-11
Volume
120
Issue
5
Pages
653-669
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2149682742
Cited by
716
References
0
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RISK FACTORS IN DENGUE SHOCK SYNDROME: A PROSPECTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY IN RAYONG, THAILAND. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113932
The paper
SANGKAWIBHA, N., ROJANASUPHOT, S., AHANDRIK, S., VIRIYAPONGSE, S., JATANASEN, S., SALITUL, V., PHANTHUMACHINDA, B., & HALSTEAD, S. B. (1984). RISK FACTORS IN DENGUE SHOCK SYNDROME: A PROSPECTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY IN RAYONG, THAILAND. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113932

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.