Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SEROTYPE-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF DENGUE

BALMASEDA, ANGEL, HAMMOND, SAMANTHA N., PÉREZ, LEONEL, TELLEZ, YOLANDA, SABORÍO, SAIRA INDIRA, MERCADO, JUAN CARLOS, CUADRA, RICARDO, ROCHA, JULIO, PÉREZ, MARIA ANGELES, SILVA, SHEYLA, ROCHA, CRISANTA, HARRIS, EVA·2006·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Dengue, the most prevalent arthropod-borne viral disease of humans, is caused by four serotypes of dengue virus (DENV 1–4). Although all four DENV serotypes cause a range of illness, defining precisely which clinical characteristics are associated with the distinct serotypes has been elusive. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 984 and 313 hospitalized children with confirmed DENV infections during two time periods, respectively, in the same hospitals in Nicaragua: a 3-year period (1999–2001) when DENV-2 accounted for 96% of the viruses identified, and the 2003 dengue season when DENV-1 predominated (87% of identified serotypes). When the two periods were compared, more shock (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.35–2.71) and internal hemorrhage (OR 2.05, CI 1.16–3.78) were observed in the period when DENV-2 predominated, whereas increased vascular permeability was associated to a greater degree with the DENV-1 period (OR 2.36, CI 1.80–3.09). Compared with the DENV-2 period, the DENV-1 season was associated with more hospitalized primary dengue cases (OR 3.86, CI 2.72–5.48) and more primary DENV infections with severe manifestations (OR 2.93, CI 2.00–4.28). These findings provide new data to characterize the pathogenic potential of distinct DENV serotypes in human populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.449

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
BALMASEDA, A., HAMMOND, S. N., PÉREZ, L., TELLEZ, Y., SABORÍO, S. I., MERCADO, J. C., CUADRA, R., ROCHA, J., PÉREZ, M. A., SILVA, S., ROCHA, C., & HARRIS, E.
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2006-03
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
449-456
ISSN
0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122917913
Cited by
299
References
26
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SEROTYPE-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF DENGUE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.449
The paper
BALMASEDA, A., HAMMOND, S. N., PÉREZ, L., TELLEZ, Y., SABORÍO, S. I., MERCADO, J. C., CUADRA, R., ROCHA, J., PÉREZ, M. A., SILVA, S., ROCHA, C., & HARRIS, E. (2006). SEROTYPE-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF DENGUE. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.449

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.