Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

RANDOM DIGIT DIALING IN SELECTING A POPULATION-BASED CONTROL GROUP

HARTGE, P., BRINTON, L. A., ROSENTHAL, J. F., CAHILL, J. I., HOOVER, R. N., WAKSBERG, J.·1984·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Results are described from four epidemiologic studies in the United States which used random digit dialing in over 30,000 households to identify controls from the general population for use in case-control studies. Methods and problems in telephone sampling are discussed. It is concluded that if complete population rosters are unavailable and if the population to be sampled has the high rates of telephone ownership typical of much of the United States, telephone-based sampling can yield a nearly random sample of the individuals in a population, often at much less expense than can dwelling-based sampling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113955

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
HARTGE, P., BRINTON, L. A., ROSENTHAL, J. F., CAHILL, J. I., HOOVER, R. N., & WAKSBERG, J.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1984-12-01
Volume
120
Issue
6
Pages
825-833
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2165570448
Cited by
251
References
0
FWCI
20.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RANDOM DIGIT DIALING IN SELECTING A POPULATION-BASED CONTROL GROUP. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113955
The paper
HARTGE, P., BRINTON, L. A., ROSENTHAL, J. F., CAHILL, J. I., HOOVER, R. N., & WAKSBERG, J. (1984). RANDOM DIGIT DIALING IN SELECTING A POPULATION-BASED CONTROL GROUP. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113955

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.