CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 271Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFood Safety and HygieneListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CAMPYLOBACTER ENTERITIS AT A UNIVERSITY: TRANSMISSION FROM EATINGCHICKEN AND FROM CATS

DEMING, MICHAEL S., TAUXE, ROBERT V., BLAKE, PAUL A., DIXON, SARAH E., FOWLER, BARBARA S., JONES, T. STEPHEN, LOCKAMY, EDWARD A., PATTON, CHARLOTTE M., SIKES, ROBERT O.·1987·American Journal of Epidemiology
DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114685
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Campylobacter jejuni is the most common enteric pathogen isolated from university and college students in the United States. During the fall and winter quarters of the 1983-1984 academic year, the authors conducted a case-control study at the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, to identify risk factors for C. jejuni enteritis. Students with diarrhea whose cultures yielded C. jejuni were compared with controls matched by age, sex, and residence. A total of 45 case-control pairs were interviewed about exposures during the week before the case's onset of illness. The infections occurred sporadically and were caused by a wide variety of C. jejuni serotypes. Three risk factors were identified: eating fully cooked chicken, eating chicken reported to be raw or undercooked, and contact with a cat or kitten. No case reported drinking raw milk. No significant association was found between illness and the places where chicken meals were prepared or the specific manner in which chicken was cooked. Chicken may be the principal vehicle of transmission for sporadic Campylobacter enteritis among college students.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114685

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–271 of 271

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
DEMING, M. S., TAUXE, R. V., BLAKE, P. A., DIXON, S. E., FOWLER, B. S., JONES, T. S., LOCKAMY, E. A., PATTON, C. M., & SIKES, R. O.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1987-09
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
526-534
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
DOI
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114685
OpenAlex
W2097235809
Cited by
271
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Keywords
Campylobacter jejuni, campylobacteriosis, university students, chicken consumption, raw chicken meat, cat contact, zoonotic transmission, risk factors, diarrhea, serotypes, foodborne transmission
MeSH terms
Animals, Campylobacter fetus, Campylobacter Infections, Cat Diseases, Cats, Chickens, Disease Outbreaks, Enteritis, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Food Contamination, Georgia, Humans, Male, Poultry Diseases, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, Student Health Services, Zoonoses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review