The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DIETARY INTAKE AND COLON CANCER: SEX- AND ANATOMIC SITE-SPECIFIC ASSOCIATIONS
Abstract
A case-control study was conducted in Utah between July 1979 and June 1983 in which 231 cases of colon cancer identified through the Utah Cancer Registry and 391 controls identified through random digit dialing were interviewed. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated comparing the highest exposure categories with the lowest exposure categories. The highest quintile of body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2 for males; weight (kg)/height (m)1.5 for females) was associated with increased risk in both males (OR = 2.1) and females (OR = 2.3). In females, total dietary fat (OR = 1.9) and energy intake (OR = 1.5) were associated with an increased colon cancer risk after adjusting for age, body mass index, and crude fiber. Fiber was protective in females (OR = 0.5) after adjusting for age, body mass index, and energy intake, as was beta-carotene (OR = 0.5) after also adjusting for crude fiber. Adjusted risk estimates in males were 2.0 for total dietary fat, 3.8 for polyunsaturated fat, 2.1 for monounsaturated fat, 2.1 for energy intake, 2.5 for protein, 0.3 for fiber, 0.4 for beta-carotene, and 0.3 for cruciferous vegetables. Risk estimates differed by site of cancer within the colon. In males, protein (OR = 3.8) was a risk factor for cancer of the descending colon, while fats (OR = 2.7-8.8) increased the risk of cancer of the ascending colon. The hypotheses that dietary fat increases colon cancer risk while dietary fiber decreases colon cancer risk and that fat and protein may be independently associated with colon cancer risk are supported.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: A review of the epidemiological evidence
Block, G., Patterson, B., & Subar, A. (1992) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1080/01635589209514201 · Cited by 3,238
Cruciferous vegetables and human cancer risk: epidemiologic evidence and mechanistic basis
HIGDON, J., DELAGE, B., WILLIAMS, D., & DASHWOOD, R. (2007) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2007.01.009 · Cited by 1,039
Insulin, Insulin-Like Growth Factors and Colon Cancer: A Review of the Evidence
Giovannucci, E. (2001) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/131.11.3109s · Cited by 959
Giovannucci, E. (1995) · Cancer Causes and Control · doi:10.1007/bf00052777 · Cited by 817
Are there two sides to colorectal cancer?
Iacopetta, B. (2002) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.10635 · Cited by 782
Metadata
- Authors
- WEST, D. W., SLATTERY, M. L., ROBISON, L. M., SCHUMAN, K. L., FORD, M. H., MAHONEY, A. W., LYON, J. L., & SORENSEN, A. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 883-894
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W1903868960
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DIETARY INTAKE AND COLON CANCER: SEX- AND ANATOMIC SITE-SPECIFIC ASSOCIATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115421
- The paper
- WEST, D. W., SLATTERY, M. L., ROBISON, L. M., SCHUMAN, K. L., FORD, M. H., MAHONEY, A. W., LYON, J. L., & SORENSEN, A. W. (1989). DIETARY INTAKE AND COLON CANCER: SEX- AND ANATOMIC SITE-SPECIFIC ASSOCIATIONS. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115421
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.