Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

AGE AT ONSET AS AN INDICATOR OF FAMILIAL RISK OF BREAST CANCER

CLAUS, ELIZABETH B., RISCH, NEIL J., THOMPSON, W. DOUGLAS·1990·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The familial risk of breast cancer was investigated in a large population-based, case-control study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control. The data set included 4,730 histologically confirmed breast cancer cases aged 20-54 years and 4,688 controls who were frequency matched to cases by geographic region and 5-year categories of age. Family history of breast cancer among first-degree female relatives of cases and controls was utilized. To identify factors associated with familial risk of breast cancer, a Cox proportional hazards model was used, modeling time to onset of breast cancer among mothers and sisters. Case relatives were at greater risk than control relatives. Among relatives of cases, a significant increase in the risk of breast cancer was associated with decreasing age at onset of the case and with having an additional relative affected with breast cancer. The hazard ratio for the mother of a case with breast cancer diagnosed at 50 years of age was 1.7 (95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.4-2.0), compared with 2.7 (95% Cl 2.2-3.2) and 4.3 (95% Cl 3.3-5.6) for the mother of a case whose diagnosis occurred at 40 and 30 years of age, respectively. The hazard ratio for the sister of a case with an unaffected mother and at least one affected sister in addition to the case was 3.6 (95% Cl 2.1-6.1) when the case was diagnosed at age 50, compared with 5.8 (95% Cl 3.4-10.0) and 9.4 (95% Cl 5.3-16.7) when the case was diagnosed at 40 and 30 years of age, respectively. The hazard ratio for the sister of a case with an affected mother and no additional affected sisters was 5.9 (95% Cl 3.9-8.9) when the case was diagnosed at age 50, compared with 9.4 (95% Cl 6.2-14.4) and 15.1 (95% Cl 9.4-24.3) when the case was diagnosed at 40 and 30 years of age, respectively. The hazard ratio for the sister of a case with both an affected mother and at least one affected sister aside from the case was 17.1 (95% Cl 9.4-31.3) when the case was diagnosed at age 50, compared with 27.5 (95% Cl 15.0-50.3) and 44.2 (95% Cl 23.5-83.2) when the case was diagnosed at 40 and 30 years of age, respectively. No effect of case's menopausal status and bilaterality was found, indicating that in addition to a positive family history, age at onset is the strongest indicator of a possible genetic subtype of breast cancer in these data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115616

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
CLAUS, E. B., RISCH, N. J., & THOMPSON, W. D.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1990-06
Volume
131
Issue
6
Pages
961-972
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2122443986
Cited by
366
References
0
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.