The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AGE AT ONSET AS AN INDICATOR OF FAMILIAL RISK OF BREAST CANCER
Abstract
The familial risk of breast cancer was investigated in a large population-based, case-control study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control. The data set included 4,730 histologically confirmed breast cancer cases aged 20-54 years and 4,688 controls who were frequency matched to cases by geographic region and 5-year categories of age. Family history of breast cancer among first-degree female relatives of cases and controls was utilized. To identify factors associated with familial risk of breast cancer, a Cox proportional hazards model was used, modeling time to onset of breast cancer among mothers and sisters. Case relatives were at greater risk than control relatives. Among relatives of cases, a significant increase in the risk of breast cancer was associated with decreasing age at onset of the case and with having an additional relative affected with breast cancer. The hazard ratio for the mother of a case with breast cancer diagnosed at 50 years of age was 1.7 (95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.4-2.0), compared with 2.7 (95% Cl 2.2-3.2) and 4.3 (95% Cl 3.3-5.6) for the mother of a case whose diagnosis occurred at 40 and 30 years of age, respectively. The hazard ratio for the sister of a case with an unaffected mother and at least one affected sister in addition to the case was 3.6 (95% Cl 2.1-6.1) when the case was diagnosed at age 50, compared with 5.8 (95% Cl 3.4-10.0) and 9.4 (95% Cl 5.3-16.7) when the case was diagnosed at 40 and 30 years of age, respectively. The hazard ratio for the sister of a case with an affected mother and no additional affected sisters was 5.9 (95% Cl 3.9-8.9) when the case was diagnosed at age 50, compared with 9.4 (95% Cl 6.2-14.4) and 15.1 (95% Cl 9.4-24.3) when the case was diagnosed at 40 and 30 years of age, respectively. The hazard ratio for the sister of a case with both an affected mother and at least one affected sister aside from the case was 17.1 (95% Cl 9.4-31.3) when the case was diagnosed at age 50, compared with 27.5 (95% Cl 15.0-50.3) and 44.2 (95% Cl 23.5-83.2) when the case was diagnosed at 40 and 30 years of age, respectively. No effect of case's menopausal status and bilaterality was found, indicating that in addition to a positive family history, age at onset is the strongest indicator of a possible genetic subtype of breast cancer in these data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003
Smith, R. A., Saslow, D., Andrews Sawyer, K., Burke, W., Costanza, M. E., Evans, W. P., Foster, R. S., Hendrick, E., Eyre, H. J., & Sener, S. (2003) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141 · Cited by 770
Health and Racial Disparity in Breast Cancer
Yedjou, C. G., Sims, J. N., Miele, L., Noubissi, F., Lowe, L., Fonseca, D. D., Alo, R. A., Payton, M., & Tchounwou, P. B. (2019) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_3 · Cited by 509
Importance of Age of Onset in Pancreatic Cancer Kindreds
Brune, K. A., Lau, B., Palmisano, E., Canto, M., Goggins, M. G., Hruban, R. H., & Klein, A. P. (2010) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djp466 · Cited by 257
Tumour spectrum in non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer families in Sweden
Wendt, C., Lindblom, A., Arver, B., von Wachenfeldt, A., & Margolin, S. (2015) · Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13053-015-0036-z · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- CLAUS, E. B., RISCH, N. J., & THOMPSON, W. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 961-972
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2122443986
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.