The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Population-based Evaluation of Glaucoma Screening: The Baltimore Eye Survey
Abstract
The Baltimore Eye Survey was a population-based survey conducted from January 1985 to November 1988 among residents of east Baltimore, Maryland, who were 40 years of age or older. A total of 5,308 black subjects and white subjects received a comprehensive screening examination for glaucoma including tonometry, visual fields, stereoscopic fundus photography, and a detailed medical and ophthalmic history. Based on a definitive examination, a diagnosis of glaucoma of any type was made for 196 persons. Tonometry, cup:disc ratio, and narrowest neuroretinal rim width were evaluated for their ability to correctly classify subjects into diseased or nondiseased states. There were no cutoff values at which these variables provided a reasonable balance of sensitivity and specificity, separately or in combination. Logistic regression models were fit that included demographic and other risk factors. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for varying cutoff levels on the distribution of predicted probabilities. There was no cutoff for which reasonable sensitivity and specificity were obtained. The authors conclude that the effectiveness of current techniques for glaucoma screening is limited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Number of people with glaucoma worldwide.
Quigley, H. A. (1996) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.80.5.389 · Cited by 2,998
Self-citation(1998) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00223-2 · Cited by 1,599
Retinal Imaging and Image Analysis
Abramoff, M. D., Garvin, M. K., & Sonka, M. (2010) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2010.2084567 · Cited by 1,439
Glaucoma in China: how big is the problem?
Foster, P. J. (2001) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.85.11.1277 · Cited by 598
Burr, J., Mowatt, G., Hernández, R., Siddiqui, M., Cook, J., Lourenco, T., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Fraser, C., Azuara-Blanco, A., et al. (2007) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta11410 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Tielsch, J. M., Katz, J., Singh, K., Quigley, H. A., Gottsch, J. D., Javitt, J., & Sommer, A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-11-15
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1102-1110
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W1910727610
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Population-based Evaluation of Glaucoma Screening: The Baltimore Eye Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116013
- The paper
- Tielsch, J. M., Katz, J., Singh, K., Quigley, H. A., Gottsch, J. D., Javitt, J., & Sommer, A. (1991). A Population-based Evaluation of Glaucoma Screening: The Baltimore Eye Survey. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.