The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in Birmingham, Alabama
Abstract
Several recent studies have reported associations between common levels of particulate air pollution and small increases in daily mortality. This study examined whether a similar association could be found in the southern United States, with different weather patterns than the previous studies, and examined the sensitivity of the results to different methods of analysis and covariate control. Data were available in Birmingham, Alabama, from August 1985 through 1988. Regression analyses controlled for weather, time trends, day of the week, and year of study and removed any long-term patterns (such as seasonal and monthly fluctuations) from the data by trigonometric filtering. A significant association was found between inhalable particles and daily mortality in Poisson regression analysis (relative risk = 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.20). The relative risk was estimated for a 100-micrograms/m3 increase in inhalable particles. Results were unchanged when least squares regression was used, when robust regression was used, and under an alternative filtering scheme. Diagnostic plots showed that the filtering successfully removed long wavelength patterns from the data. The generalized additive model, which models the expected number of deaths as nonparametric smoothed functions of the covariates, was then used to ensure adequate control for any nonlinearities in the weather dependence. Essentially identical results for inhalable particles were seen, with no evidence of a threshold down to the lowest observed exposure levels. The association also was unchanged when all days with particulate air pollution levels in excess of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards were deleted. The magnitude of the effect is consistent with recent estimates from Philadelphia, Steubenville, Detroit, Minneapolis, St. Louis, and Utah Valley.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of Epidemiological Evidence of Health Effects of Particulate Air Pollution
Pope, C. A., Dockery, D. W., & Schwartz, J. (1995) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.3109/08958379509014267 · Cited by 833
Self-citationDaniels, M. J. (2000) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/152.5.397 · Cited by 348
Associations between air pollution and mortality in Phoenix, 1995-1997.
Mar, T. F., Norris, G. A., Koenig, J. Q., & Larson, T. V. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108347 · Cited by 347
The winter choke: Coal-Fired heating, air pollution, and mortality in China
Fan, M., He, G., & Zhou, M. (2020) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102316 · Cited by 298
Dominici, F., Samet, J. M., & Zeger, S. L. (2000) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/1467-985x.00170 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-05-15
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1136-1147
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W1909880584
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in Birmingham, Alabama. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116617
- The paper
- Schwartz, J. (1993). Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in Birmingham, Alabama. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116617
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.