The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validation of 1989 Tennessee Birth Certificates using Maternal and Newborn Hospital Records
Abstract
In 1989, the state of Tennessee adopted a new birth certificate which incorporates changes recommended by the National Center for Health Statistics in the revised US Standard Certificate of Live Birth. The data now being collected are intended to provide improved information for understanding maternal and infant health issues. To assess data quality, the authors compared information reported on the 1989 Tennessee birth certificates with the same data obtained from an ongoing case-control study in which the delivery hospital medical records of mothers and infants were reviewed by trained nurse abstractors using a structured data collection instrument. Cases (n = 1,016) were all infants born in Tennessee in 1989 with birth weights less than 1,500 g or other infants who died during the first 28 days of life. The infants were identified from linked birth-death certificate files. Control infants (n = 634) were randomly selected from the noncase population. The most reliable information obtained from birth certificates was descriptive demographic data and birth weight. The quality of information obtained from the new birth certificate checkboxes varied. Routine medical procedures were better reported on the birth certificates than relatively uncommon conditions and occurrences, even serious ones. Caution is needed in using birth certificate data for assessment of maternal medical risk factors, complications of labor and delivery, abnormal conditions of the newborn, and congenital anomalies, since sensitivity is low.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Major congenital malformations after first-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitors
Cooper, W. O., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Arbogast, P. G., Dudley, J. A., Dyer, S., Gideon, P. S., Hall, K., & Ray, W. A. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055202 · Cited by 1,192
Increasing use of antidepressants in pregnancy
Cooper, W. O., Willy, M. E., Pont, S. J., & Ray, W. A. (2007) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.033 · Cited by 458
A population‐based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989–2003
Boulet, S. L., Rasmussen, S. A., & Honein, M. A. (2008) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32208 · Cited by 370
Lydon-Rochelle, M. T., Holt, V. L., Cárdenas, V., Nelson, J. C., Easterling, T. R., Gardella, C., & Callaghan, W. M. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.096 · Cited by 332
Reliability of Birth Certificate Data: A Multi-Hospital Comparison to Medical Records Information
DiGiuseppe, D. L., Aron, D. C., Ranbom, L., Harper, D. L., & Rosenthal, G. E. (2002) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1019726112597 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Piper, J. M., Mitchel, E. F., Snowden, M., Hall, C., Adams, M., & Taylor, P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-04-01
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 758-768
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2171434842
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of 1989 Tennessee Birth Certificates using Maternal and Newborn Hospital Records. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116736
- The paper
- Piper, J. M., Mitchel, E. F., Snowden, M., Hall, C., Adams, M., & Taylor, P. (1993). Validation of 1989 Tennessee Birth Certificates using Maternal and Newborn Hospital Records. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116736
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.