Cited by 370Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations

A population‐based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989–2003

Boulet, Sheree L., Rasmussen, Sonja A., Honein, Margaret A.·2008·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Abstract

Craniosynostosis is a birth defect characterized by premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures. We describe the birth prevalence of craniosynostosis and related risk factors among infants born to residents of metropolitan Atlanta during 1989–2003. Data from the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP) were used to identify infants with craniosynostosis. Case records with a code for craniosynostosis were reviewed to substantiate the diagnosis of craniosynostosis and to classify infants as having isolated craniosynostosis (no other unrelated major defects), multiple defects (one or more additional major, unrelated defects), or a syndrome (recognized or strongly suspected single‐gene condition or chromosome abnormality). Vital records data on births of Georgia residents were used to analyze craniosynostosis prevalence by year of birth, maternal race and age, parity, plurality, and infants' sex, birth weight, and gestational age. We identified 281 infants born with craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta during 1989–2003: 84% with isolated craniosynostosis, 7% with multiple defects, and 9% with syndromes. The birth prevalence was 4.3 per 10,000 births, results consistent with findings from other population‐based studies using similar case definitions. Apert syndrome was diagnosed in 40% of the syndromic cases, and sagittal synostosis was diagnosed in 39% of the cases of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Maternal age 35 years or older, multiple birth, male sex, and birth weight >4,000 g were risk factors for craniosynostosis. Published 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.a.32208

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overall prevalence of craniosynostosis is estimated at between 1 in 2100 and 1 in 2500 births.

    “The overall prevalence of craniosynostosis has been estimated at between 1 in 2100 and 1 in 2500 births.1,2”

    From Craniosynostosis (2011) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Environmental influences, including in utero mechanical constraints, maternal health conditions, medication exposure, and other prenatal risk factors, have been proposed as contributing factors particularly in non-syndromic cases.

    “Environmental influences have also been proposed as contributing factors, particularly in non-syndromic cases. These include in utero mechanical constraints, maternal health conditions, medication exposure, and other prenatal risk factors [1, 2, 11, 22–25].”
  • The majority of studies reported an odds ratio of male occurring CS ranging from 1.46 to 4.5, with a geometric mean of ~2.7.

    “The majority of the studies studied the odds ratio of male occurring CS with an OR ranging from 1.46 to 4.5 (with geometric mean of ~ 2.7) [2, 3, 15, 26, 50, 53, 74, 80, 82, 86, 96–98, 102, 103, 117].”
  • High weight at birth ≥4000 g is correlated with sCS, with OR 1.61-2.91.

    “At birth, there are some phenotypes that has been seen to correlate with sCS, from high weight at birth ≥ 4000 g (OR 1.61–2.91) [2, 82] to very low birth weight < 2500 g (OR = 1.5–2.32) [29, 102]), also to breech presentation (OR = 2.39) [63, 102].”
  • Advanced maternal age (>35 years) is highly correlated with sagittal suture fusion, with OR ranging from 2.01 to 2.32.

    “Firstly, advanced maternal age (> 35 years) has been found to highly correlate with sagittal suture fusion, with an OR ranging from 2.01 to 2.32 [2, 82, 93, 102], while young maternal age has a protective effect OR 0.6 [56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boulet, S. L., Rasmussen, S. A., & Honein, M. A.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Boulet, Sheree L.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-14
Volume
146A
Issue
8
Pages
984-991
ISSN
  • 1552-4825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4833
OpenAlex
W1994575776
Cited by
370
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Keywords
craniosynostosis, birth prevalence, risk factors, Apert syndrome, sagittal synostosis, syndromic craniosynostosis, maternal age, multiple births, birth weight, gestational age, congenital birth defects, Atlanta
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Birth Weight, Craniosynostoses, Female, Georgia, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Maternal Age, Medical Records, Registries, Risk Factors, Sutures, Syndrome, Urban Population, Prevalence, Sentinel Surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review