The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) has been used on a biennial basis since 1990 to measure health risk behaviors of high school students nationwide. The YRBS measures behaviors related to intentional and unintentional injury, tobacco use, alcohol and other drug use, sexual activity, diet, and physical activity. The authors present the results from a test-retest reliability study of the YRBS, conducted by administering the YRBS questionnaire to 1,679 students in grades 7 through 12 on two occasions 14 days apart. The authors computed a kappa statistic for each of 53 self-report items and compared group prevalence estimates across the two testing occasions. Kappas ranged from 14.5% to 91.1%; 71.7% of the items were rated as having "substantial" or higher reliability (kappa = 61-100%). No significant differences were found between the prevalence estimates at time 1 and time 2. Responses of seventh grade students were less consistent than those of students in higher grades, indicating that the YRBS is best suited for students in grade 8 and above. Except for a few suspect items, students appeared to report personal health risk behaviors reliably over time. Reliability and validity issues in health behavior assessment also are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic
MACLURE, M., & WILLETT, W. C. (1987) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/126.2.161 · Cited by 808
Cited by
Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age
CASPERSEN, C. J., PEREIRA, M. A., & CURRAN, K. M. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200009000-00013 · Cited by 1,145
Reliability of the 1999 youth risk behavior survey questionnaire
BRENER, N., KANN, L., MCMANUS, T., KINCHEN, S., SUNDBERG, E., & ROSS, J. (2002) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00339-7 · Cited by 1,101
Self-citationSports Participation and Health-Related Behaviors Among US Youth
Pate, R. R., Trost, S. G., Levin, S., & Dowda, M. (2000) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.154.9.904 · Cited by 503
Kollins, S. H., McClernon, F. J., & Fuemmeler, B. F. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.10.1142 · Cited by 369
Multiple sexual partners among U.S. adolescents and young adults.
Santelli, J. S., Brener, N. D., Lowry, R., Bhatt, A., & Zabin, L. S. (1998) · Family Planning Perspectives · doi:10.2307/2991502 · Cited by 357
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brener, N. D., Collins, J. L., Kann, L., Warren, C. W., & Williams, B. I.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-03-15
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 575-580
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2248150956
- Cited by
- 934
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 140.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.