Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Response of root respiration to changes in temperature and its relevance to global warming

Open access
ATKIN, OWEN K., EDWARDS, EVERARD J., LOVEYS, BETH R.·2000·New Phytologist

Abstract

Global warming over the next century is likely to be associated with a change in the extent to which atmospheric and soil temperatures fluctuate, on both a daily and a seasonal basis. The average annual temperature of the Earth's surface is expected to increase, as is the frequency of hot days. In this review, we explore what effects short‐term and long‐term changes in temperature are likely to have on root respiratory metabolism, and what impacts such changes will have on daily, seasonal and annual CO 2 release by roots under field conditions. We demonstrate that Q10 values, and the degree of acclimation, differ between and within plant species. Changes in the temperature sensitivity of respiration with measuring temperature are highlighted. Temperature‐dependent changes in adenylate control and substrate supply are likely to control the Q10 and degree of acclimation of root respiration. Limitations in respiration capacity are unlikely to control respiratory flux at most temperatures. The potential role of nonphosphorylating pathways such as the alternative oxidase in controlling Q10 values is highlighted. The possibility that potentially rapid changes in adenylate control might underlie the acclimation response (rather than slow changes in enzyme capacity) has implications for the total amount of CO 2 respired by roots daily and annually. Our modelling suggests that rapid acclimation will result in near‐perfect homeostasis of respiration rates and minimize annual CO 2 release. However, annual CO 2 release increases substantially if the speed of full acclimation is lower. Our modelling exercise also shows that high Q10 values have the potential to increase daily and annual CO 2 release substantially, particularly if the frequency of hot days increases after global warming.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00683.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
ATKIN, O. K., EDWARDS, E. J., & LOVEYS, B. R.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-07
Volume
147
Issue
1
Pages
141-154
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2113529646
Cited by
438
References
35
FWCI
27.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of root respiration to changes in temperature and its relevance to global warming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00683.x
The paper
ATKIN, O. K., EDWARDS, E. J., & LOVEYS, B. R. (2000). Response of root respiration to changes in temperature and its relevance to global warming. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00683.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.