The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Plants Respond to Climate Change: Migration Rates, Individualism and the Consequences for Plant Communities
Open accessAbstract
The magnitude of climate changes forecast for the next century is comparable to the magnitude of warming during the last deglaciation. No climate change of similar magnitude has occurred since that event. The palaeoecological evidence of the response, especially of plants, to past climate change indicates that evolutionary adaptation has played no more than a minor role and that migration is the usual response of organisms to climate change. The individualism of response has important implications with respect to changes in the nature of vegetation and ecosystems. The maximum realized rates of migratory response by trees, although perhaps matching the maximum potential rates, are close to the maximum that it is believed can be achieved by such long-lived sessile organisms. The rate of climate change forecast for the future is 10–100 times faster than the rate of deglacial warming. Unless steps are taken to facilitate the migratory response of organisms to the forecast changes, then widespread extinction is likely. Artificial dispersal of trees and other organisms of limited dispersal and/or migratory capacity, the general extension of the legal protection currently afforded to some threatened organisms only within designated reserves, and the integration of wildlife habitat requirements and of wildlife corridors into human landscape utilization are all likely to be necessary. Stringent measures to limit the extent of future climate change by limiting emissions of greenhouse gases will also be necessary if the possibility of widespread and even catastrophic extinction is to be avoided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change
Parmesan, C. (2006) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100 · Cited by 8,652
Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses
GIENAPP, P., TEPLITSKY, C., ALHO, J. S., MILLS, J. A., & MERILÄ, J. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03413.x · Cited by 1,256
Community Assembly, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptive Evolution in Changing Environments
Ackerly, D. D. (2003) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/368401 · Cited by 893
Potential Impact of Climate Change on Vegetation in the European Alps: A Review
Theurillat, J.-P., & Guisan, A. (2001) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1010632015572 · Cited by 853
Empirical Analyses of Plant‐Climate Relationships for the Western United States
Rehfeldt, G. E., Crookston, N. L., Warwell, M. V., & Evans, J. S. (2006) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/507711 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- HUNTLEY, B.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- supp1
- Pages
- 15-22
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2371985437
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Plants Respond to Climate Change: Migration Rates, Individualism and the Consequences for Plant Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088205
- The paper
- HUNTLEY, B. (1991). How Plants Respond to Climate Change: Migration Rates, Individualism and the Consequences for Plant Communities. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.