Cited by 9Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies

DECISION-MAKING

AUDLEY, R. J.·1964·British Medical Bulletin

Abstract

Journal Article DECISION-MAKING Get access R. J. AUDLEY, Ph.D. R. J. AUDLEY, Ph.D. Department of Psychology, University College London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar British Medical Bulletin, Volume 20, Issue 1, January 1964, Pages 27–31, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070277 Published: 01 January 1964

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070277

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AUDLEY, R. J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
AUDLEY, R. J.
Venue
British Medical Bulletin
Published
1964-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
27-31
ISSN
  • 0007-1420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8391
OpenAlex
W4240898402
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Medical Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Keywords
decision-making
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review