The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Gender and the relationship between ventricular repolarization and cardiac cycle length during 24-h Holter recordings
Abstract
AIMS: There are gender-related differences in the QT interval measured from standard ECG tracings. However, these observations are based on a limited number of beats recorded in resting conditions. Computerized Holter techniques enable ventricular repolarization and its relationship with cardiac cycle length to be analysed long term. Previous studies used only the initial portion of the QT interval to the T wave apex (QTa) to measure ventricular repolarization; however, QTa may underestimate the total QT duration (QTe). The aims of this study were to verify whether QTa and QTe had similar rate-dependence in normal subjects and whether gender-related QTe differences observed in the resting ECG were also present in the long-term QT intervalcycle length relationship. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four hour Holter recordings were obtained in 40 healthy young subjects. 20 females and 20 males (mean age 28 +/- 9 and 26 +/- 5 years, respectively ns). Two-channel ECG digitized signals were processed using new automatic QT analysis software (Ela Medical), which converted the 24-h recordings into 2880 30-s templates. It also measured the QT apex (QTa) QT end (QTe) and the RR interval (ms) of each template, and computed the slopes of the linear regressions of QTe and QTa values plotted against the corresponding RR interval (QTe/RR and QTa/RR). Females had a shorter RR interval than males (803 +/- 129 vs 877 +/- 86 ms. P = 0.037), with longer mean QTc (420 +/- 17 vs 400 +/- 200 ms. P = 0.0005). In both genders. QTa/RR slopes were steeper than QTe/RR slopes (P = 0.0001). Both QTa/RR and QTe/RR slopes were steeper in females than in males (QTa/RR 0.20 +/- 0.04 vs 0.16 +/- 0.03, P = 0.001; QTe/RR 0.16 +/- 0.04 vs 0.13 +/- 0.03, P = 0.027). Of note, QTa and QTe at fixed long cycle lengths (1000 ms) were longer in women than in men (QTa1000 330 +/- 20 vs 309 +/- 18 ms: P = 0.002; QTe1000 410 +/- 17 vs 389 +/- 19 ms: P = 0.002), while they did not differ at fixed short cycle lengths (600 ms). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that both the initial portion of the QT interval (QTa) and the entire QT interval (QTe) are useful since QTa is more prolonged than QTe at increasing cycle lengths, and thus includes most of the heart rate dependency of ventricular repolarization. In normal subjects, both the QTc and the long-term relationship between ventricular repolarization and heart rate are affected by gender. The differences in QTa and QTe duration between males and females are more marked at long cycle lengths and disappear at short cycle lengths. Finally, this study also proves the clinical feasibility of assessing the long-term relationship between ventricular repolarization and heart rate by utilizing the automatic measurement of the QT interval from 24-h Holter recordings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A study from Groningen, Netherlands found that AF is an independent risk factor for new-onset HF with preserved ejection fraction in women, but not in men.98”
From Atrial fibrillation in women: epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and prognosis (2016) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“The bulk of studies evaluating sex differences in the AF-related risk of HF have showed no significant difference; however, a few studies have suggested higher risk in women (Supplementary Table S8).”
From Atrial fibrillation in women: epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and prognosis (2016) · cites this paper as [98]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Stramba-Badiale, M., Locati, E. H., Martinelli, A., Courville, J., & Schwartz, P. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- University of Pavia (IT)
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-06-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1000-1006
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2106478893
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- ventricular repolarization, QT interval, cardiac cycle length, gender differences, 24-hour Holter monitoring, QTc interval, rate dependence, RR interval
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Periodicity, Reference Values, Sex Factors, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Ventricular Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review