Cited by 76Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Atrial flutter can be terminated by a class III antiarrhythmic drug but not by a class IC drug

CRIJNS, H. J. G. M., VAN GELDER, I. C., KINGMA, J. H., DUNSELMAN, P. H. J. M., GOSSELINK, A. T. M., LIE, K. I.·1994·European Heart Journal

Abstract

In atrial flutter, chemical conversion with class I drugs is often unsuccessful, whereas class III drugs seem more promising. The different electrophysiological effects of these drugs may explain this discrepancy. To date, only experimental data show the differential effects of these drugs on conversion rate and atrial flutter cycle length. This study evaluates the effects of the class IC antiarrhythmic drug flecainide, and of dofetilide, a new class III drug, on conversion rate and flutter cycle length in patients with atrial flutter. Flecainide (11 patients) was given as an intravenous bolus of 2 mg.kg-1 in 10 min and dofetilide (10 patients) as a maximum intravenous bolus of 8 micrograms.kg-1 in 15 min. Baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups. Only one patient treated with flecainide converted to sinus rhythm. This patient showed the largest flutter cycle length increase (280 to 420 ms). By contrast, seven of the 10 patients treated with dofetilide converted to sinus rhythm. Patients treated with flecainide showed a significantly larger increase in atrial flutter cycle length at the end of the infusion compared to the dofetilide-treated patients (from 226 +/- 28 to 317 +/- 52 ms vs from 221 +/- 26 to 239 +/- 39 ms, respectively). In conclusion, dofetilide is more effective than flecainide in the conversion of atrial flutter to sinus rhythm, despite the fact that flecainide produced a more prolonged flutter cycle length. Thus, action potential prolongation in the absence of conduction slowing seems more effective in terminating human atrial flutter than depression of the excitability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060402

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
CRIJNS, H. J. G. M., VAN GELDER, I. C., KINGMA, J. H., DUNSELMAN, P. H. J. M., GOSSELINK, A. T. M., & LIE, K. I.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
CRIJNS, H. J. G. M.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
1994-10
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
1403-1408
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W1763503342
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
atrial flutter, chemical cardioversion, class III antiarrhythmic agents, class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs, flecainide, dofetilide, conversion to sinus rhythm, action potential prolongation
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Flutter, Double-Blind Method, Echocardiography, Electrocardiography, Female, Flecainide, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Male, Middle Aged, Phenethylamines, Sulfonamides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review