The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intravenous and intracoronary fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: Overview of results on mortality, reinfarction and side-effects from 33 randomized controlled trials
Abstract
During the past 25 years, 24 randomized trials of intravenous (IV) fibrinolytic treatment have been reported, involving a total of some 6000 patients in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. Most tested IV streptokinase (SK), but a few tested IV urokinase (UK). In the past 2 or 3 years numerous small randomized trials of intracoronary (IC) SK have been started, 9 of which, involving a total of about 1000 such patients, have been reported. Because all of these IV and IC trials were small (the largest including only 747 patients), their separate results appear contradictory and unreliable. But, an overview of the data from these trials indicates that IV treatment produces a highly significant (22% +/- 5%, P less than 0.001) reduction in the odds of death, an even larger reduction in the odds of reinfarction, and an absolute frequency of serious adverse effects to set against this that is much smaller than the absolute mortality reduction. The apparent size of the mortality reduction in the IV trials was similar whether anticoagulants were compulsory or optional, whether treatment was in a coronary care unit or an ordinary ward and, surprisingly, whether treatment began early (less than 6 h from onset of symptoms) or late (generally 12-24 h). In addition, there was no evidence that UK was more effective than the less expensive SK, or that, despite their technical complexity, the new IC regimes were more effective than the old IV regimes. Even the IV schedules that have been studied in randomized trials were, however, quite complex, and the IC schedules were far more so. Perhaps partly because of this, none of them is widely used. If so, then some much simpler, and hence more widely practicable, IV SK regimes should be developed and tested. For example, a simple one hour high-dose IV SK infusion, without anticoagulation, will successfully convert virtually all of the available plasminogen into plasmin. But, it may be several years before the net effects on mortality of any more widely practicable IV SK regimes can be agreed unless many of the hospitals that do not wish routinely to use IC regimes or the complex previous IV regimes will collaborate in multicentre randomized trials that can, if necessary, continue rapid intake until some tens of thousands of patients have been randomized, and some thousands of deaths have been observed among the control and treated patients. The same, of course, may be true for any other fibrinolytic regimes (e.g. infusion of tissue plasminogen activator) if their net effects on mortality are comparable to those of IV SK.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
(1988) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92833-4 · Cited by 3,687
Self-citationStatistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485 · Cited by 1,946
Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research
L'ABBÉ, K. A., DETSKY, A. S., & O'ROURKE, K. (1987) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-107-2-224 · Cited by 1,267
A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis
Furuya-Kanamori, L., Barendregt, J. J., & Doi, S. A. R. (2018) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000141 · Cited by 1,160
Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction
Lau, J., Antman, E. M., Jimenez-Silva, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199207233270406 · Cited by 1,140
Relapse prevention with antidepressant drug treatment in depressive disorders: a systematic review
Geddes, J. R., Carney, S. M., Davies, C., Furukawa, T. A., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., & Goodwin, G. M. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12599-8 · Cited by 945
Homocysteine lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular events
Martí-Carvajal, A. J., Solà, I., Lathyris, D., & Salanti, G. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006612.pub2 · Cited by 520
(2010) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.348 · Cited by 498
Balk, E. M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.22.2973 · Cited by 478
Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials
Peto, R., Collins, R., & Gray, R. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)00150-o · Cited by 365
Self-citationWhen to stop a clinical trial.
Pocock, S. J. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6847.235 · Cited by 255
Meta-analysis: Unresolved issues and future developments
Smith, G. D., & Egger, M. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7126.221 · Cited by 175
Inter‐study differences: How should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results?
Bailey, K. R. (1987) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780060327 · Cited by 108
Homocysteine and vascular disease: review of published results of the homocysteine‐lowering trials
Clarke, R., Halsey, J., Bennett, D., & Lewington, S. (2011) · Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · doi:10.1007/s10545-010-9235-y · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- YUSUF, S., COLLINS, R., PETO, R., FURBERG, C., STAMPFER, M. J., GOLDHABER, S. Z., & HENNEKENS, C. H.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 556-585
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W1920261218
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.