Cited by 175Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Meta-analysis: Unresolved issues and future developments

Open access
Smith, G. D., Egger, M.·1998·BMJ

Abstract

In our patient-authored series, Marije Klein reminds healthcare professionals how important casual conversations can be in creating or destroying patients’ confidence and sense of safety. For more information about the series, contact Rosamund Snow, patient editor, rsnow@bmj.com.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.316.7126.221

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An explicit recommendation to search for and include unpublished studies was given in several articles, with the argument that the results of unpublished studies may differ systematically from published studies.

    “An explicit recommendation to search for and include unpublished studies was given in several articles [34, 48, 50, 61, 96], with the argument that the results of unpublished studies may differ systematically from published studies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, G. D., & Egger, M.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-01-17
Volume
316
Issue
7126
Pages
221-225
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2087857295
Cited by
175
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
28.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
patient safety, patient confidence, patient perspectives, healthcare communication, patient-provider relationship
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Decision Making, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Information Storage and Retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review