The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endometriosis in pregnant and non-pregnant women at tubal sterilization
Abstract
The prevalence of endometriosis was investigated in 208 women at the time of laparoscopic tubal sterilization. In 101 women who were in the first trimester of pregnancy, 16% endometriosis was found. In 107 non-pregnant women, 22% endometriosis was detected. Endometriosis in the pregnant women showed more superficial, non-pigmented, gland-like lesions than in the non-pregnant group. In 23% of the endometriotic lesions from pregnant women, no decidualization was found. No special risk factors for developing endometriosis were found.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“During such a singular phase of ‘first-step’ injury, transtubal dislocation of fragments of basal endometrium might occur.”
From The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis, tissue injury and repair (2009) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eskenazi, B., & Warner, M. L. (1997) · Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70302-8 · Cited by 1,617
The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis, tissue injury and repair
Leyendecker, G., Wildt, L., & Mall, G. (2009) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1191-0 · Cited by 418
Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis
Jacobson, T. Z., Duffy, J. M., Barlow, D. H., Farquhar, C. M., Koninckx, P. R., & Olive, D. L. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001398.pub2 · Cited by 367
RetractedEpidemiology of endometriosis among parous women
Sangi‐Haghpeykar, H., & POINDEXTERIII, A. (1995) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00074-2 · Cited by 288
Leyendecker, G., Bilgicyildirim, A., Inacker, M., Stalf, T., Huppert, P., Mall, G., Böttcher, B., & Wildt, L. (2015) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3437-8 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Moen, M. H., & Muus, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Hammerfest Hospital (NO)
- ORCID
- Moen, Mette Haase
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 699-702
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2257558112
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- endometriosis, pregnancy, tubal ligation, endometriotic lesions, decidualization, endometriosis prevalence, risk factors, first trimester
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Norway, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Sterilization, Tubal, Uterine Diseases, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
