Cited by 61Reproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Relationship of biochemical pregnancy to pre-ovulatory endometrial thickness and pattern in patients undergoing ovulation induction

Dickey, R.P., Olar, T.T., Taylor, S.N., Curole, D.N., Harrigill, K.·1993·Human Reproduction

Abstract

In order to assess the relationship between pre-ovulatory endometrial thickness and pattern and biochemical pregnancy, the pregnancy outcome was retrospectively analysed in 81 patients undergoing ovulation induction evaluated by vaginal ultrasound on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration or luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. Biochemical pregnancies occurred in 7/32 (21.9%) pregnancies when endometrial thickness was < 9 mm, compared to 0/49 when endometrial thickness was > or = 9 mm on the day of HCG administration or LH surge (P < 0.0025). Clinical abortions occurred in 5/32 (15.6%) pregnancies when endometrial thickness was 6-8 mm, compared to 6/49 (12.2%) when endometrial thickness was 6-8 mm (NS). Endometrial thickness was related to the cycle day of HCG or LH surge (r = 0.37, P < 0.001) but was unrelated to oestradiol level on the day of HCG administration or LH surge (r = 0.12). Biochemical pregnancies were related to endometrial pattern (r = -0.22, P = 0.02) but were unrelated to maternal age or previous abortions. Clinical abortions were related to age (r = 0.26, P = 0.01) and to previous abortion (r = 0.25, P = 0.013) but were unrelated to endometrial pattern. Neither biochemical pregnancy nor clinical abortion was related to oestradiol or LH levels on the day of HCG administration or LH surge. These findings suggest that the majority of biochemical pregnancies do not result from karyotypically abnormal embryos, as do clinical abortions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickey, R. P., Olar, T. T., Taylor, S. N., Curole, D. N., & Harrigill, K.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Dickey, R.P.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
1993-02
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
327-330
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W1913710255
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
biochemical pregnancy, endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, ovulation induction, human chorionic gonadotropin, luteinizing hormone surge, estradiol, maternal age, previous abortion, embryo karyotype
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Aging, Endometrium, Female, Follicular Phase, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Humans, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review