The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Implantation: Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess whether patients with tubal infertility and a hydrosalpinx have a reduced implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization. The study included 741 patients who had 1190 consecutive oocyte aspirations. The presence or absence of hydrosalpinges was assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography on day 2 of all cycles. In 62 patients treated in 104 cycles a hydrosalpinx was diagnosed, whereas 493 patients treated in 813 cycles had no hydrosalpinx and eight patients treated in 16 cycles had uncertain hydrosalpinx. The results show that the presence of a hydrosalpinx is associated with a reduced pregnancy rate per aspiration (19.2 versus 32.6%; P < 0.01), reduced implantation rate (2.9 versus 10.3%, P < 0.0005), reduced delivery rate per aspiration (5.8 versus 20.9%, P < 0.0005), reduced delivery rate per embryo transfer (6.6 versus 22.8%, P < 0.0005) and increased early pregnancy loss (70 versus 36%, P < 0.005). Among 178 patients with unexplained infertility or other infertility factors treated with 257 aspirations the results were similar to those in patients with tubal infertility without a hydrosalpinx. In conclusion, the presence of a hydrosalpinx does not impair the number of embryos transferred but seems to impair the implantation process. We hypothesize that this may be due to leakage of fluid into the uterine cavity which may disturb the receptivity of the endometrium and/or the developing embryos.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women with normal ovulation and normospermic partners
Meuleman, C., Vandenabeele, B., Fieuws, S., Spiessens, C., Timmerman, D., & D'Hooghe, T. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.056 · Cited by 606
Strandell, A., Lindhard, A., Waldenström, U., Thorburn, J., Janson, P. O., & Hamberger, L. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.11.2762 · Cited by 349
Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation
Johnson, N., van Voorst, S., Sowter, M. C., Strandell, A., & Mol, B. W. J. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002125.pub3 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersen, A. N., Yue, Z., Meng, F. J., & Petersen, K.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1935-1938
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2262892907
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implantation: Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138362
- The paper
- Andersen, A. N., Yue, Z., Meng, F. J., & Petersen, K. (1994). Implantation: Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138362
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.