Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 800

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic

Brewer, G. A., Selden, S. C.·1998·Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Abstract

There is a strong undercurrent in the literature of public administration that suggests the existence—and importance—of service-related motives linked to the public interest. Publicservice motivation (PSM) is a fledgling theory that predicts that many individuals predisposed to public norms and emotions act in the public interest, even when doing so runs counter to their selfinterest. This study represents the first attempt to link public service motivation to prosocial behaviors. Specifically, we draw a conceptual linkage between PSM and whistle blowing and we test hypotheses derived from these concepts with archival data collected by the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. Our findings reveal that federal whistle blowers act in ways that are consistent with the theory of PSM. That is, they are motivated by concern for the public interest, they are high performers, and they report high levels of achievement, job commitment, and job satisfaction. Moreover, federal whistle blowers are likely to work in high performing work groups and organizations. Overall, this study provides strong empirical support for the nascent theory of PSM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024390

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 800

Metadata

Authors
Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C.
Venue
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Published
1998-07-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
413-440
ISSN
  • 1053-1858 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9803
OpenAlex
W2046004785
Cited by
800
References
1
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024390
The paper
Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (1998). Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024390

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.