The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic
Abstract
There is a strong undercurrent in the literature of public administration that suggests the existence—and importance—of service-related motives linked to the public interest. Publicservice motivation (PSM) is a fledgling theory that predicts that many individuals predisposed to public norms and emotions act in the public interest, even when doing so runs counter to their selfinterest. This study represents the first attempt to link public service motivation to prosocial behaviors. Specifically, we draw a conceptual linkage between PSM and whistle blowing and we test hypotheses derived from these concepts with archival data collected by the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. Our findings reveal that federal whistle blowers act in ways that are consistent with the theory of PSM. That is, they are motivated by concern for the public interest, they are high performers, and they report high levels of achievement, job commitment, and job satisfaction. Moreover, federal whistle blowers are likely to work in high performing work groups and organizations. Overall, this study provides strong empirical support for the nascent theory of PSM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91 · Cited by 2,672
Cited by
Vandenabeele, W. (2009) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852308099504 · Cited by 386
Building Theory and Empirical Evidence about Public Service Motivation
Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967490801887673 · Cited by 367
How Does Public Service Motivation Among Teachers Affect Student Performance in Schools?
Andersen, L. B., Heinesen, E., & Pedersen, L. H. (2014) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mut082 · Cited by 179
Motivating Employees of the Public Sector: Does Public Service Motivation Matter?
Anderfuhren-Biget, S., Varone, F., Giauque, D., & Ritz, A. (2010) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2010.503783 · Cited by 152
Spirituality and Public Service
Houston, D. J., & Cartwright, K. E. (2007) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00699.x · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 413-440
- ISSN
- 1053-1858 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9803
- OpenAlex
- W2046004785
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024390
- The paper
- Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (1998). Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024390
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.