The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conserved sequence motifs, alignment, and secondary structure for the third domain of animal 12S rRNA
Abstract
Secondary structure models are an important step for aligning sequences, understanding probabilities of nucleotide substitutions, and evaluating the reliability of phylogenetic reconstructions. A set of conserved sequence motifs is derived from comparative sequence analysis of 184 invertebrate and vertebrate taxa (including many taxa from the same genera, families, and orders) with reference to a secondary structure model for domain III of animal mitochondrial small subunit (12S) ribosomal RNA. A template is presented to assist with secondary structure drawing. Our model is similar to previous models but is more specific to mitochondrial DNA, fitting both invertebrate and vertebrate groups, including taxa with markedly different nucleotide compositions. The second half of the domain III sequence can be difficult to align precisely, even when secondary structure information is considered. This is especially true for comparisons of anciently diverged taxa, but well-conserved motifs assist in determining biologically meaningful alignments. Patterns of conservation and variability in both paired and unpaired regions make differential phylogenetic weighting in terms of "stems" and "loops" unsatisfactory. We emphasize looking carefully at the sequence data before and during analyses, and advocate the use of conserved motifs and other secondary structure information for assessing sequencing fidelity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved free-energy parameters for predictions of RNA duplex stability.
Freier, S. M., Kierzek, R., Jaeger, J. A., Sugimoto, N., Caruthers, M. H., Neilson, T., & Turner, D. H. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.24.9373 · Cited by 1,470
Evidence from 12 S Ribosomal RNA Sequences that Onychophorans Are Modified Arthropods
Ballard, J. W. O., Olsen, G. J., Faith, D. P., Odgers, W. A., Rowell, D. M., & Atkinson, P. W. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1455227 · Cited by 248
(1986) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040379 · Cited by 210
Cited by
Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silicoPCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias
Clarke, L. J., Soubrier, J., Weyrich, L. S., & Cooper, A. (2014) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12265 · Cited by 351
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hickson, R. E., Simon, C., Cooper, A., Spicer, G. S., Sullivan, J., & Penny, D.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 150-169
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2096042561
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conserved sequence motifs, alignment, and secondary structure for the third domain of animal 12S rRNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025552
- The paper
- Hickson, R. E., Simon, C., Cooper, A., Spicer, G. S., Sullivan, J., & Penny, D. (1996). Conserved sequence motifs, alignment, and secondary structure for the third domain of animal 12S rRNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.