The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mutation rates of di-, tri- and tetranucleotide repeats in Drosophila melanogaster
Open accessAbstract
In a recent study, we reported that the combined average mutation rate of 10 di-, 6 tri-, and 8 tetranucleotide repeats in Drosophila melanogaster was 6.3 x 10(-6) mutations per locus per generation, a rate substantially below that of microsatellite repeat units in mammals studied to date (range = 10(-2)-10(-5) per locus per generation). To obtain a more precise estimate of mutation rate for dinucleotide repeat motifs alone, we assayed 39 new dinucleotide repeat microsatellite loci in the mutation accumulation lines from our earlier study. Our estimate of mutation rate for a total of 49 dinucleotide repeats is 9.3 x 10(-6) per locus per generation, only slightly higher than the estimate from our earlier study. We also estimated the relative difference in microsatellite mutation rate among di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide repeats in the genome of D. melanogaster using a method based on population variation, and we found that tri- and tetranucleotide repeats mutate at rates 6.4 and 8.4 times slower than that of dinucleotide repeats, respectively. The slower mutation rates of tri- and tetranucleotide repeats appear to be associated with a relatively short repeat unit length of these repeat motifs in the genome of D. melanogaster. A positive correlation between repeat unit length and allelic variation suggests that mutation rate increases as the repeat unit lengths of microsatellites increase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dating the Origin of the CCR5-Δ32 AIDS-Resistance Allele by the Coalescence of Haplotypes
Stephens, J. C., Reich, D. E., Goldstein, D. B., Shin, H. D., Smith, M. W., Carrington, M., Winkler, C., Huttley, G. A., Allikmets, R., Schriml, L., et al. (1998) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/301867 · Cited by 520
Cited by
A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast.
Lynch, M., Sung, W., Morris, K., Coffey, N., Landry, C. R., Dopman, E. B., Dickinson, W. J., Okamoto, K., Kulkarni, S., Hartl, D. L., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803466105 · Cited by 708
On the Possibility of Constructive Neutral Evolution
Stoltzfus, A. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/pl00006540 · Cited by 533
Molecular Systematics of Anopheles: From Subgenera to Subpopulations
Krzywinski, J., & Besansky, N. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112647 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Schug, M. D., Hutter, C. M., Wetterstrand, K. A., Gaudette, M. S., Mackay, T. F., & Aquadro, C. F.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1751-1760
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2005157157
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mutation rates of di-, tri- and tetranucleotide repeats in Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025901
- The paper
- Schug, M. D., Hutter, C. M., Wetterstrand, K. A., Gaudette, M. S., Mackay, T. F., & Aquadro, C. F. (1998). The mutation rates of di-, tri- and tetranucleotide repeats in Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.