The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.
Abstract
Synonymous codons are not used equally in many organisms, and the extent of codon bias varies among loci. Earlier studies have suggested that more highly expressed loci in Drosophila melanogaster are more biased, consistent with findings from several prokaryotes and unicellular eukaryotes that codon bias is partly due to natural selection for translational efficiency. We link this model of varying selection intensity to the population-genetics prediction that the effectiveness of natural selection is decreased under reduced recombination. In analyses of 385 D. melanogaster loci, we find that codon bias is reduced in regions of low recombination (i.e., near centromeres and telomeres and on the fourth chromosome). The effect does not appear to be a linear function of recombination rate; rather, it seems limited to regions with the very lowest levels of recombination. The large majority of the genome apparently experiences recombination at a sufficiently high rate for effective natural selection against suboptimal codons. These findings support models of the Hill-Robertson effect and genetic hitchhiking and are largely consistent with multiple reports of low levels of DNA sequence variation in regions of low recombination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes
Duret, L., & Galtier, N. (2009) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-150001 · Cited by 737
Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans
Duret, L. (2002) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(02)00353-2 · Cited by 502
Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species
Cutter, A. D., & Payseur, B. A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3425 · Cited by 461
The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants
Charlesworth, B. (1994) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300032365 · Cited by 366
The Population Genetics of the Origin and Divergence of the Drosophila simulans Complex Species
Kliman, R. M., Andolfatto, P., Coyne, J. A., Depaulis, F., Kreitman, M., Berry, A. J., McCarter, J., Wakeley, J., & Hey, J. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/156.4.1913 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1239-58
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2274856807
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040074
- The paper
- Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. (1993). Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.