The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative evolutionary analysis of rDNA ITS regions in Drosophila.
Open accessAbstract
The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the ribosomal DNA is generally considered to be under low functional constraint, and it is therefore often treated as a typical nonfunctional spacer sequence. We have analyzed the ITS regions of five species from the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, two Drosophila species from outside this group (D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis), as well as from the more distantly related dipteran fly Musca domestica. The sequence comparisons show a distinctive conservation/divergence pattern, indicating that some regions are more conserved than others. Moreover, secondary-structure calculations indicate several conserved structural elements within the ITS regions. On the other hand, a statistical test that allows us to estimate the fraction of sites that are not under selective constraint suggests that more than half of the spacer is apparently free to diverge and evolves with a rate that is close to the neutral rate of sequence evolution in Drosophila. The ITS sequences can be used to derive a molecular phylogeny for the species under study. We find that the ITS tree is largely in line with the so-far-known phylogeny of this group of species, with one difference. The species most distant within the D. melanogaster subgroup is D. yakuba, rather than D. orena, as is normally assumed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Cited by
Santos, S. R., Taylor, D. J., Kinzie, III, Hidaka, M., Sakai, K., & Coffroth, M. A. (2002) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00010-6 · Cited by 261
(1994) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040121 · Cited by 257
An Evolutionary Analysis of Orphan Genes in Drosophila
Domazet-Loso, T., & Tautz, D. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1311003 · Cited by 254
Speciation and phylogeography in the cosmopolitan marine moon jelly, Aurelia sp
Schroth, W., Jarms, G., Streit, B., & Schierwater, B. (2002) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-2-1 · Cited by 224
Regulation of Nucleolar Dominance in Drosophila melanogaster
Warsinger-Pepe, N., Li, D., & Yamashita, Y. M. (2020) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.119.302471 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 513-22
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W1870155935
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative evolutionary analysis of rDNA ITS regions in Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040131
- The paper
- Comparative evolutionary analysis of rDNA ITS regions in Drosophila. (1994). Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.