Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

AN ECONOMETRIC APPROACH TO THE MEASUREMENT OF POVERTY

DESAI, MEGHNAD, SHAH, ANUP·1988·Oxford Economic Papers

Abstract

This paper presents a method for specifying and measuring poverty defined as relative deprivation. We base our measure of an individual's poverty on the distance between his/her consumption experience relative to the norm. Consumption experience is defined in terms of events and the modal frequency of an event in the community defines the norm. Aggregation over events is made to capture the objective as well as subjective nature of deprivation. Our measure is related to that proposed by Townsend and econometric estimation is carried out using the Townsend data. Income is found to be neither the sole nor the most important indicator of deprivation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041868

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
DESAI, M., & SHAH, A.
Venue
Oxford Economic Papers
Published
1988-09
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
505-522
ISSN
  • 0030-7653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3812
OpenAlex
W2136100880
Cited by
268
References
0
FWCI
45.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AN ECONOMETRIC APPROACH TO THE MEASUREMENT OF POVERTY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041868
The paper
DESAI, M., & SHAH, A. (1988). AN ECONOMETRIC APPROACH TO THE MEASUREMENT OF POVERTY. Oxford Economic Papers. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041868

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.