Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 568

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficient Promoter Cassettes for Enhanced Expression of Foreign Genes in Dicotyledonous and Monocotyledonous Plants

Mitsuhara, Ichiro, Ugaki, Masashi, Hirochika, Hirohiko, Ohshima, Masahiko, Murakami, Taka, Gotoh, Yoko, Katayose, Yuichi, Nakamura, Shigeo, Honkura, Ryoso, Nishimiya, Satoshi, Ueno, Keiichiro, Mochizuki, Atsushi, Tanimoto, Hideo, Tsugawa, Hidehito, Otsuki, Yoshiaki, Ohashi, Yuko·1996·Plant and Cell Physiology

Abstract

A series of chimeric promoters for higher-level expression of foreign genes in plants was constructed as fusions of a gene for beta-glucuronidase (GUS) with the terminator of a gene for nopaline synthase (nos) or of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S transcript, and the strength of these promoters was assayed in transient and stable expression systems in tobacco and rice. As parts of these promoters, the CaMV 35S core promoter, three different 5'-upstream sequences of the 35S promoter, the first intron of a gene for phaseolin, and a 5'-untranslated sequence (omega sequence) of tobacco mosaic virus were used in various combinations. In tobacco and rice protoplasts, all three fragments of the 35S promoter (-419 to -90, -390 to -90 and -290 to -90, relative to the site of initiation of transcription), the intron, and the omega sequence effectively enhanced GUS activity. Some chimeric promoters allowed levels of GUS activity that were 20- to 70-fold higher than those obtained with the 35S promoter in pBI221. In tobacco protoplasts, the two longer fragments of the 35S promoter were more effective than the shortest fragment. In rice cells, by contrast, the shortest fragment was as effective as the two longer ones. The terminator of the 35S transcript was more effective than that of the nos gene for gene expression. In transgenic tobacco plants, a representative powerful promoter, as compared to the 35S promoter, allowed 10- and 50-fold higher levels of expression on average and at most, respectively, with no clear qualitative differences in tissue- and organ-specific patterns of expression. When the representative promoter was introduced into tobacco with a gene for luciferase, the autofluorescence of detached leaves after a supply of luciferin to petioles was great and was easily detectable by the naked eye in a dark room.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a028913

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 568

Metadata

Authors
Mitsuhara, I., Ugaki, M., Hirochika, H., Ohshima, M., Murakami, T., Gotoh, Y., Katayose, Y., Nakamura, S., Honkura, R., Nishimiya, S., Ueno, K., Mochizuki, A., Tanimoto, H., Tsugawa, H., Otsuki, Y., & Ohashi, Y.
Venue
Plant and Cell Physiology
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
49-59
ISSN
  • 0032-0781 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-9053
OpenAlex
W2109322155
Cited by
568
References
0
FWCI
15.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Promoter Cassettes for Enhanced Expression of Foreign Genes in Dicotyledonous and Monocotyledonous Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a028913
The paper
Mitsuhara, I., Ugaki, M., Hirochika, H., Ohshima, M., Murakami, T., Gotoh, Y., Katayose, Y., Nakamura, S., Honkura, R., Nishimiya, S., Ueno, K., Mochizuki, A., Tanimoto, H., Tsugawa, H., Otsuki, Y., & Ohashi, Y. (1996). Efficient Promoter Cassettes for Enhanced Expression of Foreign Genes in Dicotyledonous and Monocotyledonous Plants. Plant and Cell Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a028913

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.