The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns of Usual Care for Schizophrenia: Initial Results From the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Client Survey
Abstract
To examine the conformance of current patterns of usual care for persons with schizophrenia to the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Treatment Recommendations, the PORT surveyed a stratified random sample of 719 persons diagnosed with schizophrenia in two States. The types of treatment settings surveyed included acute inpatient programs and continuing outpatient programs in urban and rural locales. Using data from medical record reviews and patient interviews, the PORT assessed the conformance of current care with 12 of the Treatment Recommendations. The rates at which patients' treatment conformed to the recommendations were modest at best, generally below 50 percent. Conformance rates were higher for pharmacological than for psychosocial treatments and in rural areas than in urban ones. Rates of Treatment Recommendation conformance for minority patients were lower than those for Caucasians, and patterns of care varied between the two States. The findings indicate that current usual treatment practices likely fall substantially short of what would be recommended based on the best evidence on treatment efficacy. This disparity underscores the need for greater efforts to ensure that treatment research results are translated into practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lehman, A. F., Steinwachs, D. M., & The Co-Investigators of the PORT Project (1998) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033302 · Cited by 910
Self-citation
Cited by
Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., Mueser, K. T., & Latimer, E. (2001) · Disease Management and Health Outcomes · doi:10.2165/00115677-200109030-00003 · Cited by 614
Adequacy of Treatment for Serious Mental Illness in the United States
Wang, P. S., Demler, O., & Kessler, R. C. (2002) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.92.1.92 · Cited by 581
The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): Updated Treatment Recommendations 2009
Kreyenbuhl, J., Buchanan, R. W., Dickerson, F. B., & Dixon, L. B. (2010) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp130 · Cited by 499
A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Research on Social Skills Training for Schizophrenia
Kurtz, M. M., & Mueser, K. T. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.76.3.491 · Cited by 425
Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Alcazar-Corcoles, M. A., González-Blanch, C., Bendall, S., McGorry, P. D., & Gleeson, J. F. (2014) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.03.021 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehman, A. F., Steinwachs, D. M., & The Survey Co-Investigators of the PORT Project
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-20
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W2152371196
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Usual Care for Schizophrenia: Initial Results From the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Client Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033303
- The paper
- Lehman, A. F., Steinwachs, D. M., & The Survey Co-Investigators of the PORT Project. (1998). Patterns of Usual Care for Schizophrenia: Initial Results From the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Client Survey. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.