Cited by 373Higher Education Governance and DevelopmentPolitics, Economics, and Education PolicyGlobal Education Systems and Policies

Higher Education Funding

Open access
Barr, N.·2004·Oxford Review of Economic Policy

Abstract

The expansion of higher education throughout the OECD—and beyond—is both necessary and desirable. But it is costly, and faces competing imperatives for public spending. Higher education finance is therefore salient to an extent that is not yet fully appreciated in all countries, and is also immensely sensitive politically. This paper sets out the core lessons for financing higher education deriving from economic theory and puts them alongside lessons from country experience. The UK reforms announced in 2004 are assessed against the backdrop of those two elements. A concluding section briefly maps out unfinished business.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxrep/grh015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher education markets are inherently vulnerable to market failures that lead students to underinvest in college.

    “Higher education markets are inherently vulnerable to market failures that lead students to underinvest in college (Barr, 2004).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Barr, 2004

  • The key challenge of a free university system is constrained funding, which can lead to declining quality, caps on quantity, and inefficient allocation of resources to the students most in-need.

    “The key challenge of a free university system is constrained funding, which can lead to declining quality, caps on quantity, and inefficient allocation of resources to the students most in-need (Barr, 2004).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Barr, 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Barr, Nicholas (1989), Student Loans: The Next Steps, Aberdeen University Press for the David Hume Institute and the Suntory-Toyota International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  2. Barr, Nicholas (1991), 'Income-Contingent Student Loans: An Idea Whose Time Has Come', in G. K. Shaw (ed.), Economics, Culture and Education: Essays in Honour of Mark Blaug, (Edward Elgar, 1991), pp. 155-170, reprinted in Nicholas Barr (2001b, Vol. III, pp. 583-600).
  3. Barr, Nicholas (1993), 'Alternative Funding Resources for Higher Education', Economic Journal, Vol 103, No 418, May 1993, pp. 718-728, reprinted in Belfield, Clive R. and Levin, Henry M. (eds), The Economics of Higher Education, The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics 165, Cheltenham and Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar, pp. 534-44.
  4. Barr, Nicholas (1998), 'Towards a "Third Way": Rebalancing the Role of the State', New Economy, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 71-6.
  5. Barr, Nicholas (2001a), The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State, London and New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Barr, Nicholas (ed.) (2001b), Economic Theory and the Welfare State, Vol. I: Theory, Vol. II: Income Transfers, and Vol. III: Benefits in Kind, Edward Elgar Library in Critical Writings in Economics (Cheltenham and Northampton, Mass: Edward Elgar).
  7. Barr, Nicholas (2004),The Economics of the Welfare State, 4th edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, and Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
  8. Barr, Nicholas and Crawford, Iain (1998), 'The Dearing Report and the Government's Response: A Critique', The Political Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 1, January -March 1998, pp. 72-84.
  9. Barr, Nicholas and Crawford, Iain (forthcoming), Financing higher education: Lessons from the UK, Routledge.
  10. Blundell, Richard, Dearden, Lorraine, Goodman, Alissa and Reed, Howard (2000), 'The Returns to Higher Education in Britain: Evidence from a British Cohort', Economic Journal, 110/461 (February), F82-F99.
  11. Brown R. (2000), 'The new UK Quality Framework', Higher Education Quarterly 54 (4) pp. 323- 342.
  12. Chapman, Bruce (1997), 'Conceptual Issues and the Australian Experience with Income Contingent Charges for Higher Education', Economic Journal, 107/442 (May), 738-51.
  13. Commonwealth of Australia (1998), Learning for Life: Review of Higher Education Financing and Policy: Final Report, Canberra: AGPS.
  14. Friedman, Milton (1955), 'The Role of Government in Education', in Solo, A (ed.), Economics and the Public Interest, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, pp. 123-44.
  15. Glennerster, Howard, Merrett, Stephen, and Wilson, Gail (1968), 'A Graduate Tax', Higher Education Review, 1/1: pp. 26-38, reprinted in Barr (2001b: Vol. III, pp. 570-82), and in Higher Education Review 35/ 2 (Spring), pp. 25-40.
  16. Greenaway, David and Haynes, Michelle (2002), 'Funding higher education in the UK: The role of fees and loans', Economic Journal, Vol. 113, pp. F150-F166.
  17. Kornai, János (1992), The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  18. Palacios Lleras, Miguel (2004), Investing in Human Capital: A Capital Markets Approach to Student Funding, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Peacock, Alan, and Wiseman, Jack (1962), 'The Economics of Higher Education', Higher Education: Evidence -Part Two: Documentary Evidence, Cmnd 2154-XII, pp. 129-138. HMSO, London, 1963.
  20. Prest, Alan (1962), 'The Finance of University Education in Great Britain', Higher Education (the Robbins Report): Evidence -Part Two: Documentary Evidence, Cmnd 2154-XII, pp. 139-152.
  21. Roberts, Gareth (2003), Review of research assessment: Report to the UK funding bodies, Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
  22. Winston, Gordon C. (1999), 'Subsidies, Hierarchy and Peers: The Awkward Economics of Higher Education', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13/1 (Winter), 13-36.
  23. Wolf, Alison (2002), Does Education Matter: Myths about education and economic growth, London: Penguin Books.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barr, N.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Barr, N.
Venue
Oxford Review of Economic Policy
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
264-283
ISSN
  • 0266-903X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2121
OpenAlex
W2033132608
Cited by
373
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
73.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oxford Review of Economic Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Corvinus Research Archive (Corvinus University of Budapest) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Magyarország Kormánya
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Global Education Systems and Policies
Keywords
higher education funding, government spending, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review