Cited by 86Higher Education Research StudiesHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentSchool Choice and Performance

The end of free college in England: Implications for enrolments, equity, and quality

Open access
Murphy, Richard, Scott-Clayton, Judith, Wyness, Gill·2019·Economics of Education Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.11.007

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The higher education funding system in England has some features of a graduate tax: students repay loans only once income reaches a threshold, repayments are a fixed share of salary, and outstanding loans after 30 years are written off by the state.

    “The higher education funding system in England has some features of a graduate tax.Students only repay their loans once their income reaches a particular threshold, and repayments are fixed as a share of salary.Any loans outstanding after 30 years are written off by the state (Murphy, Scott-Clayton, and Wyness 2019).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Murphy, Scott-Clayton, and Wyness 2019

  • The combination of rising fees and the switch to income-contingent loans in England has had no appreciable impact on inequalities in higher education participation.

    “Indeed, it appears that the combination of rising fees and the switch to income-contingent loans in England has had no appreciable impact on inequalities in higher education participation (Murphy, Scott-Clayton, andWyness 2019 andAzmat andSimion 2017).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Murphy, Scott-Clayton, and Wyness 2019

  • Given the policy change, students now have more funds to help pay for all other costs that might stand in the way of enrollment.

    “Given the policy change, students now have more funds to help pay for all other costs that might stand in the way of enrollment (Murphy, et al., 2019).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Murphy, et al., 2019

  • The introduction of fees in England coincided with increased institutional resources, relaxed enrollment capacity constraints, and stabilized socioeconomic gaps in enrollment.

    “The authors find that the introduction of fees coincided with increased institutional resources, relaxed enrollment capacity constraints, and stabilized socioeconomic gaps in enrollment (after years of widening inequality).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Murphy, Scott-Clayton, and Wyness (2019)

  • Murphy et al. (2019) conclude that the policy largely achieved its goals.

    “Murphy et al. (2019) conclude that the policy largely achieved its goals.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Murphy et al. (2019)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, R., Scott-Clayton, J., & Wyness, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Richard
Venue
Economics of Education Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
71
Pages
7-22
ISSN
0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902459591
Cited by
86
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
20.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Edinburgh
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
tuition fees, free higher education, college enrollment, educational equity, institutional quality, higher education funding, income-contingent loans, participation gap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review