The design of environmental markets: What have we learned from experience with cap and trade?
Abstract
This article reviews the design of environmental markets for pollution control over the past 30 years, and identifies key market-design lessons for future applications. The focus is on a subset of the cap-and-trade systems that have been implemented, planned, or proposed around the world. Three criteria led us to the selection of systems for review. First, among the broader class of tradable permit systems, our focus is exclusively on cap-and-trade mechanisms, thereby excluding emission-reduction-credit or offset programmes. Second, among cap-and-trade mechanisms, we examine only those that target pollution abatement, and so we do not include applications to natural resource management, such as individual transferable quota systems used to regulate fisheries. Third, we focus on the most prominent applications—those that are particularly important environmentally, economically, or both.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The history of emissions trading demonstrates how important learning-from-experience is for improving the functioning of an ETS.
“The history of emissions trading demonstrates how important learning-fromexperience is for improving the functioning of an ETS (Schmalensee and Stavins, 2017).”
From The EU ETS and its companion policies: any insight for China's ETS? (2021) · cites this paper as Schmalensee and Stavins, 2017
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255 · see citing works
Challenges from State-Federal Interactions in US Climate Change Policy
Goulder, L. H., & Stavins, R. N. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.253 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationHolt, C. A., & Shobe, W. M. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2016.01.003 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The EU ETS and its companion policies: any insight for China's ETS?
Verde, S. F., Galdi, G., Alloisio, I., & Borghesi, S. (2021) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x20000595 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“1 The history of emissions trading demonstrates how important learning-fromexperience is for improving the functioning of an ETS (Schmalensee and Stavins, 2017).”
Background
- Authors
- Schmalensee, R., & Stavins, R. N.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schmalensee, Richard
- Venue
- Oxford Review of Economic Policy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 572-588
- ISSN
- 0266-903X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2121
- OpenAlex
- W2793276431
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 26.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Oxford Review of Economic Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- emissions trading, tradable permits, pollution control, pollution reduction, environmental policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review