Cited by 207Climate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainable Development and Environmental ManagementConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

The design of environmental markets: What have we learned from experience with cap and trade?

Schmalensee, Richard, Stavins, Robert N·2017·Oxford Review of Economic Policy

Abstract

This article reviews the design of environmental markets for pollution control over the past 30 years, and identifies key market-design lessons for future applications. The focus is on a subset of the cap-and-trade systems that have been implemented, planned, or proposed around the world. Three criteria led us to the selection of systems for review. First, among the broader class of tradable permit systems, our focus is exclusively on cap-and-trade mechanisms, thereby excluding emission-reduction-credit or offset programmes. Second, among cap-and-trade mechanisms, we examine only those that target pollution abatement, and so we do not include applications to natural resource management, such as individual transferable quota systems used to regulate fisheries. Third, we focus on the most prominent applications—those that are particularly important environmentally, economically, or both.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxrep/grx040

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The history of emissions trading demonstrates how important learning-from-experience is for improving the functioning of an ETS.

    “The history of emissions trading demonstrates how important learning-fromexperience is for improving the functioning of an ETS (Schmalensee and Stavins, 2017).”

    From The EU ETS and its companion policies: any insight for China's ETS? (2021) · cites this paper as Schmalensee and Stavins, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmalensee, R., & Stavins, R. N.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Schmalensee, Richard
Venue
Oxford Review of Economic Policy
Published
2017
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
572-588
ISSN
  • 0266-903X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2121
OpenAlex
W2793276431
Cited by
207
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
26.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford Review of Economic Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
emissions trading, tradable permits, pollution control, pollution reduction, environmental policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review