The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions
Open accessAbstract
This article provides a new maximum-likelihood estimator for selection models with dichotomous dependent variables when identical factors affect the selection equation and the equation of interest. Such situations arise naturally in game-theoretic models where selection is typically nonrandom and identical explanatory variables influence all decisions under investigation. When identical explanatory variables influence selection and a subsequent outcome of interest, the commonly used Heckman-type estimators identify from distributional assumptions about the residuals alone. When its own identifying assumption is reasonable, the new estimator allows the researcher to avoid the painful choice between identifying from distributional assumptions alone and adding a theoretically unjustified variable to the selection equation in a mistaken attempt to “boost” identification. The article uses Monte Carlo methods to compare the small-sample properties of the estimator with those of the Heckman-type estimator and ordinary probit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics
Maddala, G. S. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810176 · Cited by 13,240
(1976) · Annals of Economic and Social Measurement · Cited by 5,035
(1967) · Project Euclid (Cornell University) · Cited by 4,720
Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.
Kojima, K.-I. (1969) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 3,648
Introduction to Matrix Analysis
Bellman, R. (1960) · Cited by 3,020
Introduction to matrix analysis
Amar, H. (1960) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(60)90904-2 · Cited by 2,316
Shadow Prices, Market Wages, and Labor Supply
Heckman, J. (1974) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913937 · Cited by 1,852
Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions.
Gokhale, D. V., Johnson, N. L., & Kotz, S. (1973) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529696 · Cited by 1,599
Simulation and the Asymptotics of Optimization Estimators
Pakes, A., & Pollard, D. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913622 · Cited by 1,494
Cited by
Let's put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong
Achen, C. H. (2005) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1080/07388940500339167 · Cited by 576
Advancing the Empirical Research on Lobbying
de Figueiredo, J. M., & Richter, B. K. (2014) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135308 · Cited by 367
Does home care for dependent elderly people improve their mental health?
Barnay, T., & Juin, S. (2016) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.10.008 · Cited by 89
When does brokerage matter? Citation impact of research teams in an emerging academic field
Collet, F., Robertson, D. A., & Lup, D. (2014) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127014530124 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Sartori, A. E.
- Venue
- Political Analysis
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-138
- ISSN
- 1047-1987 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4989
- OpenAlex
- W2037461127
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pan/mpg001
- The paper
- Sartori, A. E. (2003). An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions. Political Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpg001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.