Cited by 576Qualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Let's put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong

Achen, Christopher H.·2005·Conflict Management and Peace Science

Abstract

Many social scientists believe that dumping long lists of explanatory variables into linear regression, probit, logit, and other statistical equations will successfully “control” for the effects of auxiliary factors. Encouraged by convenient software and ever more powerful computing, researchers also believe that this conventional approach gives the true explanatory variables the best chance to emerge. The present paper argues that these beliefs are false, and that without intensive data analysis, linear regression models are likely to be inaccurate. Instead, a quite different and less mechanical research methodology is needed, one that integrates contemporary powerful statistical methods with deep substantive knowledge and classic data—analytic techniques of creative engagement with the data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07388940500339167

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Achen, C. H.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Achen, Christopher H.
Venue
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Published
2005-09
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
327-339
ISSN
  • 0738-8942 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9219
OpenAlex
W2164062141
Cited by
576
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 27
FWCI
32.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Conflict Management and Peace Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
probit model, model specification, predictive factors, auxiliary variables, model misspecification, data analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review