Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 926

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables

Keele, Luke, Kelly, Nathan J.·2006·Political Analysis

Abstract

A lagged dependent variable in an OLS regression is often used as a means of capturing dynamic effects in political processes and as a method for ridding the model of autocorrelation. But recent work contends that the lagged dependent variable specification is too problematic for use in most situations. More specifically, if residual autocorrelation is present, the lagged dependent variable causes the coefficients for explanatory variables to be biased downward. We use a Monte Carlo analysis to assess empirically how much bias is present when a lagged dependent variable is used under a wide variety of circumstances. In our analysis, we compare the performance of the lagged dependent variable model to several other time series models. We show that while the lagged dependent variable is inappropriate in some circumstances, it remains an appropriate model for the dynamic theories often tested by applied analysts. From the analysis, we develop several practical suggestions on when and how to use lagged dependent variables on the right-hand side of a model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pan/mpj006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1093/biomet/48.1-2.85 · doi:10.1093/biomet/48.1-2.85
  2. 10.2307/1911222 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01671-L · DOI
  4. Malinvaud, 1970, Statistical Methods of Econometrics
  5. Hibbs, 1974, Sociological Methodology 1973–1974, 252
  6. 10.2307/1914095 · doi:10.2307/1914095
  7. 10.1093/0198283164.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Greene, 2003, Econometric Analysis
  9. Davidson, 1993, Estimation and Inference in Econometrics
  10. Beck, 1992, Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval, Political Analysis, 3, 27
  11. Beck, 1985, Estimating Dynamic Models Is Not Merely a Matter of Technique, Political Methodology, 11, 71
  12. 10.2307/2232053 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Phillips, 1978, Exercises in Econometrics, 2
  14. 10.2307/1907688 · doi:10.2307/1907688
  15. Hurwicz, 1950, Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models, 215

Cited by

See all 926

Metadata

Authors
Keele, L., & Kelly, N. J.
Venue
Political Analysis
Published
2006
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
186-205
ISSN
  • 1047-1987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4989
OpenAlex
W2106069978
Cited by
926
References
1
FWCI
34.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pan/mpj006
The paper
Keele, L., & Kelly, N. J. (2006). Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables. Political Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.