Cited by 270Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health Treatment and Access

Effects of internet use on health and depression: a longitudinal study

Open access
Bessière, Katie, Pressman, Sarah, Kiesler, Sara, Kraut, Robert·2010·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion of the Internet has increased the ease with which the public can obtain medical information. Most research on the utility of the Internet for health purposes has evaluated the quality of the information itself or examined its impact on clinical populations. Little is known about the consequences of its use by the general population. OBJECTIVE: Is use of the Internet by the general population for health purposes associated with a subsequent change in psychological well-being and health? Are the effects different for healthy versus ill individuals? Does the impact of using the Internet for health purposes differ from the impact of other types of Internet use? METHODS: Data come from a national US panel survey of 740 individuals conducted from 2000 to 2002. Across three surveys, respondents described their use of the Internet for different purposes, indicated whether they had any of 13 serious illnesses (or were taking care of someone with a serious illness), and reported their depression. In the initial and final surveys they also reported on their physical health. Lagged dependent variable regression analysis was used to predict changes in depression and general health reported on a later survey from frequency of different types of Internet use at an earlier period, holding constant prior depression and general health, respectively. Statistical interactions tested whether uses of the Internet predicted depression and general health differently for people who initially differed on their general health, chronic illness, and caregiver status. RESULTS: Health-related Internet use was associated with small but reliable increases in depression (ie, increasing use of the Internet for health purposes from 3 to 5 days per week to once a day was associated with .11 standard deviations more symptoms of depression, P = .002). In contrast, using the Internet for communication with friends and family was associated with small but reliable decreases in depression (ie, increasing use of the Internet for communication with friends and family purposes from 3 to 5 days per week to once a day was associated with .07 standard deviations fewer symptoms of depression, P = .007). There were no significant effects of respondents' initial health status (P = .234) or role as a caregiver (P = .911) on the association between health-related Internet use and depression. Neither type of use was associated with changes in general health (P = .705 for social uses and P = .494 for health uses). CONCLUSIONS: Using the Internet for health purposes was associated with increased depression. The increase may be due to increased rumination, unnecessary alarm, or over-attention to health problems. Additionally, those with unmeasured problems or those more prone to health anxiety may self-select online health resources. In contrast, using the Internet to communicate with friends and family was associated with declines in depression. This finding is comparable to other studies showing that social support is beneficial for well-being and lends support to the idea that the Internet is a way to strengthen and maintain social ties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1149

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across Europe, direct and indirect costs of all somatoform disorders accounted for 21 billion € in 2010.

    “Across Europe, direct and indirect costs of all somatoform disorders, the grouping where hypochondriasis were previously included, accounted for 21 billion € in 2010 [83].”

    From Is cyberchondria a new transdiagnostic digital compulsive syndrome? A systematic review of the evidence (2020) · cites this paper as [83]

    The Discussion mentions hypochondriasis only in relation to seeking health information online. Searches for somatoform disorders, European costs, and €21 billion found no passage addressing the claimed 2010 cost estimate. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [21]Farnham S Cheng L Stone L Zaner-Godsey M Hibbeln C Syrjala K Clark A Abrams J HutchWorld: clinical study of computer-mediated social support for cancer patients and their caregivers 2002 ACM CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference April 20-25, 2002 Minneapolis, MN, USA 375 382 http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=503444
  2. [43]Bessière K Kiesler S Kraut RE Boneva B Effects of Internet Use and Social Resources on Changes in Depression Information, Communication & Society 2008 11 1 47 70 10.1080/13691180701858851 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [70]Eysenbach Gunther Powell John Englesakis Marina Rizo Carlos Stern Anita Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions BMJ 2004 5 15 328 7449 1166 15142921 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166 328/7449/1166 PMC411092 15142921 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bessière, K., Pressman, S., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Kraut, Robert
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2010-03-12
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
e6
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110993830
Cited by
270
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
21.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • KiltHub Repository (cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (9900449)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
health information seeking, depression, internet use, health anxiety, rumination, caregiver burden, chronic disease, health status, psychological well-being, longitudinal effects
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Attitude to Health, Depression, Female, Health Status, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review