The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Density-Independent Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics for a Non-Ideal Equation of State
Abstract
The smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method is a useful numerical tool to study a variety of astrophysical and planetlogical problems. However, it turned out that the standard SPH algorithm has problems in dealing with hydrodynamical instabilities. This problem is due to the assumption that the local density distribution is differentiable. In order to solve this problem, a new SPH formulation, which does not require the differentiability of the density, was proposed. This new SPH method improved the treatment of hydrodynamical instabilities. This method, however, is applicable only to the equation of state (EOS) of an ideal gas. In this paper, we describe how to extend the new SPH method to non-ideal EOS. We present the results of various standard numerical tests for non-ideal EOS. Our new method works well for non-ideal EOS. We conclude that our new SPH can handle hydrodynamical instabilities for an arbitrary EOS, and that it is an attractive alternative to the standard SPH.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Concerning the SPH method, known numerical issues are related to surface and contact discontinuities (e.g.Hosono et al., 2013;Reinhardt and Stadel, 2017) or rotational instabilities in rigid body rotations (e.g.Speith, 2006).”
From SPH calculations of Mars-scale collisions: The role of the equation of state, material rheologies, and numerical effects (2018) · cites this paper as Hosono et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation
Canup, R. M., & Asphaug, E. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35089010 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 1×
“The Tillotson EOS (Tillotson 1962; Melosh 1989) is one of the most widely used EOS for giant impact simulations (e.g., Benz et al. 1986; Canup & Asphaug 2001; Genda et al. 2012).”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 413, 271, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18133.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18133.x
- 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 380, 963, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12183.x · DOI · Paper page
- 1995, J COMPUT PHYS, 121, 357, 10.1016/S0021-9991(95)90221-X · DOI · Paper page
- 1986, Icarus, 66, 515, 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90088-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 403, 1165, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16200.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16200.x
- 1985, J COMPUT PHYS, 59, 264, 10.1016/0021-9991(85)90146-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 408, 669, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17158.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 425, 1068, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21439.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, AA, 538, 9A, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117939 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117939
- 2012, APJ, 744, 137, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/137 · DOI
- 1977, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 181, 375, 10.1093/mnras/181.3.375 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 406, 2289, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16892.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16892.x
- 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 428, 2840, 10.1093/mnras/sts210 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, J COMPUT PHYS, 179, 238, 10.1006/jcph.2002.7053 · doi:10.1006/jcph.2002.7053
- 1998, INT J NUMER METHODS FLUID, 28, 392
- 1985, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 215, 125, 10.1093/mnras/215.2.125 · doi:10.1093/mnras/215.2.125
- 1977, AJ, 82, 1013, 10.1086/112164 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, APJS, 201, 18, 10.1088/0067-0049/201/2/18 · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/201/2/18
- 1992, ARAA, 30, 543, 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551 · DOI · Paper page
- 1997, J COMPUT PHYS, 136, 298, 10.1006/jcph.1997.5732 · DOI · Paper page
- 1985, AA, 149, 135
- 1997, J COMPUT PHYS, 136, 41, 10.1006/jcph.1997.5690 · DOI · Paper page
- 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 417, 136, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19021.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19021.x
- 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 345, 429, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06948.x · DOI
- 2008, J COMPUT PHYS, 227, 10040, 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.08.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 422, 3037, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20819.x · DOI
- 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 405, 1513
- 2001, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 323, 743, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04268.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, NEW ASTRON REV, 53, 78, 10.1016/j.newar.2009.08.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 2013, APJ, 768, 44, 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/44 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, ARAA, 48, 391, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130914 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 333, 649, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05445.x · DOI · Paper page
- 1992, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 257, 11, 10.1093/mnras/257.1.11 · doi:10.1093/mnras/257.1.11
- 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 408, 71, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17127.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17127.x
- 2012, AA, 546, A45, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219715 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219715
- 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 387, 427, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13260.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13260.x
- 2008, INT J NUMER METHODS FLUIDS, 56, 1993, 10.1002/fld.1580 · doi:10.1002/fld.1580
Cited by
Emsenhuber, A., Jutzi, M., & Benz, W. (2018) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.09.017 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosono, N., Saitoh, T. R., & Makino, J.
- Affiliations
- 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551 natsuki.h@geo.titech.ac.jp
- 2Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 E-1, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-10-25
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2053-051X
- 0004-6264
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density-Independent Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics for a Non-Ideal Equation of State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pasj/65.5.108
- The paper
- Hosono, N., Saitoh, T. R., & Makino, J. (2013). Density-Independent Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics for a Non-Ideal Equation of State. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/65.5.108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.