Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A general class of Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics methods and implications for fluid mixing problems

Open access
Hopkins, Philip F.·2013·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Various formulations of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) have been proposed, intended to resolve certain difficulties in the treatment of fluid mixing instabilities. Most have involved changes to the algorithm which either introduces artificial correction terms or violates what is arguably the greatest advantage of SPH over other methods: manifest conservation of energy, entropy, momentum and angular momentum. Here, we show how a class of alternative SPH equations of motion (EOM) can be derived self-consistently from a discrete particle Lagrangian – guaranteeing manifest conservation – in a manner which tremendously improves treatment of these instabilities and contact discontinuities. Saitoh & Makino recently noted that the volume element used to discretize the EOM does not need to explicitly invoke the mass density (as in the ‘standard’ approach); we show how this insight, and the resulting degree of freedom, can be incorporated into the rigorous Lagrangian formulation that retains ideal conservation properties and includes the ‘∇h’ terms that account for variable smoothing lengths. We derive a general EOM for any choice of volume element (particle ‘weights’) and method of determining smoothing lengths. We then specify this to a ‘pressure–entropy formulation’ which resolves problems in the traditional treatment of fluid interfaces. Implementing this in a new version of the gadget code, we show it leads to good performance in mixing experiments (e.g. Kelvin–Helmholtz and ‘blob’ tests). And conservation is maintained even in strong shock/blastwave tests, where formulations without manifest conservation produce large errors. This also improves the treatment of subsonic turbulence and lessens the need for large kernel particle numbers. The code changes are trivial and entail no additional numerical expense. This provides a general framework for self-consistent derivation of different ‘flavours’ of SPH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/sts210

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Hopkins, P. F.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2012-11-29
Volume
428
Issue
4
Pages
2840-2856
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1977635644
Cited by
429
References
0
FWCI
30.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A general class of Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics methods and implications for fluid mixing problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sts210
The paper
Hopkins, P. F. (2013). A general class of Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics methods and implications for fluid mixing problems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts210

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.