Unintentional cannabis exposures in children pre- and post-legalization: A retrospective review from a Canadian paediatric hospital
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Canada legalized recreational cannabis in October 2018. Cannabis is increasingly available in numerous forms—especially edibles—that make children vulnerable to unintentional intoxication. We sought to: determine the frequency of visits due to cannabis intoxication pre- and post-legalization; characterize the clinical features and circumstances of cannabis intoxication in the paediatric population; and create greater awareness among healthcare providers about this issue. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of Emergency Department visits at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (Ottawa, ON) between March 2013 and September 2020. Inclusion criteria were: age <18 years; unintentional cannabis ingestion, identified by ICD-10 codes T40.7 and X42. We assessed basic demographics, clinical signs and symptoms, exposure details, investigations, and patient disposition. Results: A total of 37 patients (22 male) met inclusion criteria, mean age 5.9±3.8 years. Most visits (32; 86%) occurred in the 2-year period after legalization. Altered levels of consciousness, lethargy/somnolence, tachycardia, and vomiting were the most common presenting signs and symptoms. The majority of exposures were to edibles (28; 76%) in the home setting (30; 81%). Poison control and child protective services were involved in 19 (51%) and 22 (59%) of cases, respectively. Twelve patients (32%) required admission to the hospital, the majority of whom stayed <24 h. Conclusions: Our data confirm increased paediatric hospital visits related to unintentional cannabis exposures post-legalization. Consideration of this clinical presentation is critical for acute care providers. Advocacy for safe storage strategies and appropriate enforcement of marketing/packaging legislation are imperative for public health policymakers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Edibles were involved in 76% of paediatric cannabis intoxication cases.
“Edibles were involved in 76% of cases.”
From The implementation and public health impacts of cannabis legalization in Canada: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
The most common symptoms of paediatric cannabis intoxication were altered levels of consciousness, lethargy or somnolence, tachycardia and vomiting.
“The most common symptoms were altered levels of consciousness, lethargy or somnolence, tachycardia and vomiting.”
From The implementation and public health impacts of cannabis legalization in Canada: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
A third (32%) of paediatric cannabis intoxication cases required admission to the hospital for fewer than 24 hours.
“A third (32%) of cases required admission to the hospital for fewer than 24 hours.”
From The implementation and public health impacts of cannabis legalization in Canada: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
In the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 37 patients were identified with cannabis intoxication between March 2013 and September 2020; 32 (86%) were admitted in the 2 years after legalization.
“They identified 37 patients (22 male), mean age 5.9 ± 3.8 years, 32 of whom (86%) were admitted in the 2 years after legalization.”
From The implementation and public health impacts of cannabis legalization in Canada: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
Cannabis and the developing brain: Insights from behavior
Trezza, V., Cuomo, V., & Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J. (2008) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.01.058 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The implementation and public health impacts of cannabis legalization in Canada: a systematic review
Hall, W., Stjepanović, D., Dawson, D., & Leung, J. (2023) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16274 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“Coret & Rowan-Legg [32] examined the frequency of paediatric ED visits for cannabis intoxication before and after legalization at the Children ’ s Hospital of Eastern Ontario between March 2013 and September 2020.”
Background
- Authors
- Coret, A., & Rowan-Legg, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Coret, Alon
- ORCID
- Coret, Alon
- Venue
- Paediatrics & Child Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-06-22
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 265-271
- ISSN
- 1205-7088 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1485
- PMC
- PMC9394633
- OpenAlex
- W4283264617
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Paediatrics & Child Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Keywords
- recreational cannabis legalization, cannabis edibles, emergency department visits, altered states of consciousness, child protection services, poison control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review