Cited by 18Poisoning and overdose treatmentsCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Unintentional cannabis exposures in children pre- and post-legalization: A retrospective review from a Canadian paediatric hospital

Open access
Coret, Alon, Rowan-Legg, Anne·2022·Paediatrics & Child Health

Abstract

Objectives: Canada legalized recreational cannabis in October 2018. Cannabis is increasingly available in numerous forms—especially edibles—that make children vulnerable to unintentional intoxication. We sought to: determine the frequency of visits due to cannabis intoxication pre- and post-legalization; characterize the clinical features and circumstances of cannabis intoxication in the paediatric population; and create greater awareness among healthcare providers about this issue. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of Emergency Department visits at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (Ottawa, ON) between March 2013 and September 2020. Inclusion criteria were: age <18 years; unintentional cannabis ingestion, identified by ICD-10 codes T40.7 and X42. We assessed basic demographics, clinical signs and symptoms, exposure details, investigations, and patient disposition. Results: A total of 37 patients (22 male) met inclusion criteria, mean age 5.9±3.8 years. Most visits (32; 86%) occurred in the 2-year period after legalization. Altered levels of consciousness, lethargy/somnolence, tachycardia, and vomiting were the most common presenting signs and symptoms. The majority of exposures were to edibles (28; 76%) in the home setting (30; 81%). Poison control and child protective services were involved in 19 (51%) and 22 (59%) of cases, respectively. Twelve patients (32%) required admission to the hospital, the majority of whom stayed <24 h. Conclusions: Our data confirm increased paediatric hospital visits related to unintentional cannabis exposures post-legalization. Consideration of this clinical presentation is critical for acute care providers. Advocacy for safe storage strategies and appropriate enforcement of marketing/packaging legislation are imperative for public health policymakers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pch/pxab090

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coret, A., & Rowan-Legg, A.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Coret, Alon
Venue
Paediatrics & Child Health
Published
2022-06-22
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
265-271
ISSN
  • 1205-7088 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1485
OpenAlex
W4283264617
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Paediatrics & Child Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
recreational cannabis legalization, cannabis edibles, emergency department visits, altered states of consciousness, child protection services, poison control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review