The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellulose Biosynthesis in Plants: from Genes to Rosettes
Abstract
Modern techniques of gene cloning have identified the CesA genes as encoding the probable catalytic subunits of the plant CelS, the cellulose synthase enzyme complex visualized in the plasma membrane as rosettes. At least 10 CesA isoforms exist in Arabidopsis and have been shown by mutant analyses to play distinct role/s in the cellulose synthesis process. Functional specialization within this family includes differences in gene expression, regulation and, possibly, catalytic function. Current data points towards some CesA isoforms potentially being responsible for initiation or elongation of the recently identified sterol beta-glucoside primer within different cell types, e.g. those undergoing either primary or secondary wall cellulose synthesis. Different CesA isoforms may also play distinct roles within the rosette, and there is some circumstantial evidence that CesA genes may encode the catalytic subunit of the mixed linkage glucan synthase or callose synthase. Various other proteins such as the Korrigan endocellulase, sucrose synthase, cytoskeletal components, Rac13, redox proteins and a lipid transfer protein have been implicated to be involved in synthesizing cellulose but, apart from CesAs, only Korrigan has been definitively linked with cellulose synthesis. These proteins should prove valuable in identifying additional CelS components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Cited by
Cosgrove, D. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1746 · Cited by 3,308
Sucrose metabolism: regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development
Koch, K. (2004) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.014 · Cited by 1,455
Payne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Populus : A Model System for Plant Biology
Jansson, S., & Douglas, C. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103956 · Cited by 645
Desprez, T., Juraniec, M., Crowell, E. F., Jouy, H., Pochylova, Z., Parcy, F., Höfte, H., Gonneau, M., & Vernhettes, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706569104 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Doblin, M. S., Kurek, I., Jacob-Wilk, D., & Delmer, D. P.
- Venue
- Plant and Cell Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-15
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1407-1420
- ISSN
- 0032-0781 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9053
- OpenAlex
- W2133097991
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellulose Biosynthesis in Plants: from Genes to Rosettes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pcp/pcf164
- The paper
- Doblin, M. S., Kurek, I., Jacob-Wilk, D., & Delmer, D. P. (2002). Cellulose Biosynthesis in Plants: from Genes to Rosettes. Plant and Cell Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcf164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.