Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Melting of Garnet Peridotite and the Origin of Komatiite and Depleted Lithosphere

Walter, M. J.·1998·Journal of Petrology

Abstract

Melting experiments on fertile peridotite KR4003, a 'pyrolitic' composition, were made from 3 to 7 GPa in piston-cylinder and multi-anvil apparatus. Temperature gradients across the sample were minimized (<25°C), and the compositions of all phases were determined. Modal abundances of coexisting phases were calculated by mass balance, and the results were used to determine phase relations. Orthopyroxene is not stable at the solidus of garnet peridotite above ∼3.3 GPa, but crystallizes above the solidus by incongruent melting of cpx. Melt compositions from 3 to 7 GPa (gt;10% melting) are picritic, komatiitic, and peridotitic. The Al2O3 content of partial melts decreases with increase in pressure because of an increase in garnet stability, providing a barometer for melting. The Al2O3 contents of komatiites indicate secular variation in the average pressure of melt segregation from residues, with early Archean komatiites and Cretaceous komatiites generated at the highest and lowest average pressures, respectively. The high CaO/Al2O3 ratios of Archean alumina undepleted komatiites ( 0.9–1.5) require residual garnet if their sources were pyrolitic. Paradoxically, chondrite-normalized Gd/Yb of about unity in these komatiites precludes garnet involvement. Archean komatiite source regions may have had CaO/Al2O3 values of about 1.4 and 1.0 in the early and late Archean, respectively, significantly greater than the pyrolitic ratio of 0.8, whereas the source of Cretaceous komatiites may have had pyrolitic CaO/Al2O3. Thus, secular variations in this ratio are indicated. Chemical differences between coeval alumina undepleted and alumina depleted komatiites can be explained by melting at similar pressures, with alumina undepleted komatiites segregating from a garnet-free residue, and alumina depleted komatiites segregating from a garnet-bearing residue. Depleted, high-temperature peridotites from cratons, and oceanic peridotites, can be melting residues of pyrolitic mantle at low pressures (<3 GPa). Average low-temperature peridotite from the Siberian craton can be generated as a residue of komatiite melt extraction from a near-pyrolitic mantle at ∼6 GPa and 40% melting. Average southern African low-temperature peridotite cannot be a melting residue of pyrolitic mantle. However it can be a residue of komatiite melt extraction at >7 GPa from a mantle enriched in SiO2 relative to pyrolite.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/petroj/39.1.29

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,425

Metadata

Authors
Walter, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Petrology
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
29-60
ISSN
  • 0022-3530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2415
OpenAlex
W2052473341
Cited by
1,425
References
2
FWCI
21.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.